Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Would you play in a spontaneous-only spellcaster game? FT: Should complexity vary...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Set" data-source="post: 4466535" data-attributes="member: 41584"><p>Every other nit-picky factor being equal (quality of DM, other players, location, timing, color of the sky, my mood, presence of apocalyptic portents of doom) I'd be *more* likely to play a game with Spontaneous casting methods than one with Prepared casting methods. I'm a big fan of *most* of the books that Gygax recommended back in the 1e DMG, but I never cared for Jack Vance, and I *strongly* dislike the Vancian memorization scheme for spell preparation.</p><p> </p><p>I'd hate to have to play a Favored Soul or Spirit Shaman over a Cleric or Druid, but I'd be peachy-keen with playing a Spontaneous-casting Cleric or Druid who only had access to a very limited list of spell known, but could cast them flexibly throughout the day.</p><p> </p><p>Same for the Sorcerer/Wizard thing. I kinda hate that Sorcerers lose four bonus Feats and get a slower spell acquisition rate, but if a DM said that he wanted to ditch the Wizard completely and make the current Wizard class cast Spontaneously and be limited to Spells Known like a Sorcerer, I'd be all for that.</p><p> </p><p>I'd be even *MORE* for a game which had both Spontaneous and Prepared casters of all spellcasting classes (cause some people like both, the freedom of spontaniety and the tactical and strategic resource-management of Vancian). A Prepared Bard with a sheaf of spellbook pages he's cobbled together over his travels, learned from his half-forgotten noble education and not some draconic heritage ('cause not every single musician in the world is descended from dragons!). A Spontaneous Paladin who knows only a few of the spells on the Paladin list, but can cast them flexibly and a little bit more frequently.</p><p> </p><p>Best of all, Clerics and Druids limited to *either* be Spontaneous casters, with a very small list of Spell Known, usable flexibly, *or* Prepared casters, with prayerbooks and holy scripts that must be maintained and developed over time, just like a Wizard's spellbook.</p><p> </p><p>None of the current situation, where Clerics and Druids (my favorite two classes, btw) automatically get access to every single spell on their spell-list, while Wizards have to pay for / aquire their spells and Sorcerers have a tiny subset of their spell list as Spells Known. 'Cause that's, IMO, at least 50% of 'the problem' with Clerics and Druids. They get it all, for free.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Set, post: 4466535, member: 41584"] Every other nit-picky factor being equal (quality of DM, other players, location, timing, color of the sky, my mood, presence of apocalyptic portents of doom) I'd be *more* likely to play a game with Spontaneous casting methods than one with Prepared casting methods. I'm a big fan of *most* of the books that Gygax recommended back in the 1e DMG, but I never cared for Jack Vance, and I *strongly* dislike the Vancian memorization scheme for spell preparation. I'd hate to have to play a Favored Soul or Spirit Shaman over a Cleric or Druid, but I'd be peachy-keen with playing a Spontaneous-casting Cleric or Druid who only had access to a very limited list of spell known, but could cast them flexibly throughout the day. Same for the Sorcerer/Wizard thing. I kinda hate that Sorcerers lose four bonus Feats and get a slower spell acquisition rate, but if a DM said that he wanted to ditch the Wizard completely and make the current Wizard class cast Spontaneously and be limited to Spells Known like a Sorcerer, I'd be all for that. I'd be even *MORE* for a game which had both Spontaneous and Prepared casters of all spellcasting classes (cause some people like both, the freedom of spontaniety and the tactical and strategic resource-management of Vancian). A Prepared Bard with a sheaf of spellbook pages he's cobbled together over his travels, learned from his half-forgotten noble education and not some draconic heritage ('cause not every single musician in the world is descended from dragons!). A Spontaneous Paladin who knows only a few of the spells on the Paladin list, but can cast them flexibly and a little bit more frequently. Best of all, Clerics and Druids limited to *either* be Spontaneous casters, with a very small list of Spell Known, usable flexibly, *or* Prepared casters, with prayerbooks and holy scripts that must be maintained and developed over time, just like a Wizard's spellbook. None of the current situation, where Clerics and Druids (my favorite two classes, btw) automatically get access to every single spell on their spell-list, while Wizards have to pay for / aquire their spells and Sorcerers have a tiny subset of their spell list as Spells Known. 'Cause that's, IMO, at least 50% of 'the problem' with Clerics and Druids. They get it all, for free. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Would you play in a spontaneous-only spellcaster game? FT: Should complexity vary...
Top