Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Would You Rather Have a LE or CN party member?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Warpiglet" data-source="post: 7472329" data-attributes="member: 6689161"><p>Exactly spot on. </p><p></p><p>Here is an example of "I'm going to do ___ because I'm ___":</p><p></p><p>What do you do as the typical neutral character? Some people might play it as maintaining a balance but the average farmer has no idea what balance this refers to. Also within a true N alignment a person might do something noble for the homeland or actually something cowardly to save themselves. It just does not make sense to say if "alignment" then this particular behavior. </p><p></p><p>Consider Lawful Good. Do all LG characters fight evil with great conviction? Are they necessarily brave or generous? They may well tend to do the right thing more often than say a true neutral, but it does not mean they always do so nor do they always act in a selfless fashion.</p><p></p><p>Alignment speaks to overall tendencies and probabilities but there is and should be incredible diversity within each of the 9 alignments. </p><p></p><p>If we look at it through this lens, my question would be about particular behaviors. The LE character that murders when it makes sense to them or within their code could bring about the death of the whole party just as easily as a CN character could. The question is less CN for me and more about the level of stupidity or conflict the character fosters. </p><p></p><p>Are there any conflict averse CN mages with the sage background who do not like restriction but usually stay in their lane? I think it is possible and the character would be little trouble in most parties. </p><p></p><p>We had a pal that always played CN characters. He played CN as "conflict needed" and was periodically attacked by other party members. He also generated fun at times and at other times acted in ways that no authority structure would tolerate which sort of ruined any sense of realism. Popping off to a noble in his own manor or keep should get you hung or worse if they are in authority but often a DM will handwave the game can continue.</p><p></p><p>So my long-winded conclusion is the alignment matters much less that the behavioral tendencies within the alignment. Two LE characters might not play the same way...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Warpiglet, post: 7472329, member: 6689161"] Exactly spot on. Here is an example of "I'm going to do ___ because I'm ___": What do you do as the typical neutral character? Some people might play it as maintaining a balance but the average farmer has no idea what balance this refers to. Also within a true N alignment a person might do something noble for the homeland or actually something cowardly to save themselves. It just does not make sense to say if "alignment" then this particular behavior. Consider Lawful Good. Do all LG characters fight evil with great conviction? Are they necessarily brave or generous? They may well tend to do the right thing more often than say a true neutral, but it does not mean they always do so nor do they always act in a selfless fashion. Alignment speaks to overall tendencies and probabilities but there is and should be incredible diversity within each of the 9 alignments. If we look at it through this lens, my question would be about particular behaviors. The LE character that murders when it makes sense to them or within their code could bring about the death of the whole party just as easily as a CN character could. The question is less CN for me and more about the level of stupidity or conflict the character fosters. Are there any conflict averse CN mages with the sage background who do not like restriction but usually stay in their lane? I think it is possible and the character would be little trouble in most parties. We had a pal that always played CN characters. He played CN as "conflict needed" and was periodically attacked by other party members. He also generated fun at times and at other times acted in ways that no authority structure would tolerate which sort of ruined any sense of realism. Popping off to a noble in his own manor or keep should get you hung or worse if they are in authority but often a DM will handwave the game can continue. So my long-winded conclusion is the alignment matters much less that the behavioral tendencies within the alignment. Two LE characters might not play the same way... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Would You Rather Have a LE or CN party member?
Top