Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Would you use a transporter beam?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="freyar" data-source="post: 6662017" data-attributes="member: 40227"><p>Right! But, if it worked, you would get a perfect recreation of yourself at the moment you started the process.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Almost. The way quantum teleportation works --- at least for single particles, which is all we know how to do --- is more like you prepare two entangled boxes, and you keep one and put one of them on the plane. Then, when it arrives, you entangle yourself with the box you kept. This effectively destroys you at your first location but creates you at the second location (not quite simultaneously, since the origin teleporter would have to send some information to the destination). The practical upshot is that you could create many pairs of these "entangled boxes" and ship one half of each pair to various destinations, so you could really set up a quantum teleportation business.</p><p></p><p>The other thing about the quantum aspect of this is that if you could really do it (though I think practically it'd be pretty much impossible), the "copy" would be quantum mechanically indistinguishable from the original. In other words, you wouldn't really be "killing" the original since a set of indistinguishable particles would take on the exact same quantum state. What look like the nearly insurmountable problems, though, are (1) keeping the two "entangled boxes" actually entangled over macroscopic times and distances and (2) figuring out how to do quantum processes to something as big as a person. Of course, these are related issues.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="freyar, post: 6662017, member: 40227"] Right! But, if it worked, you would get a perfect recreation of yourself at the moment you started the process. Almost. The way quantum teleportation works --- at least for single particles, which is all we know how to do --- is more like you prepare two entangled boxes, and you keep one and put one of them on the plane. Then, when it arrives, you entangle yourself with the box you kept. This effectively destroys you at your first location but creates you at the second location (not quite simultaneously, since the origin teleporter would have to send some information to the destination). The practical upshot is that you could create many pairs of these "entangled boxes" and ship one half of each pair to various destinations, so you could really set up a quantum teleportation business. The other thing about the quantum aspect of this is that if you could really do it (though I think practically it'd be pretty much impossible), the "copy" would be quantum mechanically indistinguishable from the original. In other words, you wouldn't really be "killing" the original since a set of indistinguishable particles would take on the exact same quantum state. What look like the nearly insurmountable problems, though, are (1) keeping the two "entangled boxes" actually entangled over macroscopic times and distances and (2) figuring out how to do quantum processes to something as big as a person. Of course, these are related issues. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Would you use a transporter beam?
Top