Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Would you use different combat rules in the same adventure?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 5814625" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>This is something that never crossed my mind until this thread below <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/new-horizons-upcoming-edition-d-d/318059-heart-matter.html" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/forum/new-horizons-upcoming-edition-d-d/318059-heart-matter.html</a></p><p></p><p>Normally when we talk about modularity for combat rules, the purpose is to cater different groups/DM: those we always want it rules-light, and those who always want it rules-heavy. But how about using both?</p><p></p><p>Would you like to have more than one way to skin a dragon? I mean, more than one ruleset for running combats (also against foes other than dragons) in the same campaign or adventure, i.e. a light ruleset for lesser combats and a heavy ruleset for more important fights?</p><p></p><p>Would you be interested in two combat ruleset that would allow you to even switch between the two during the same encounter?</p><p></p><p>Starting from my post in the thread above (<a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/new-horizons-upcoming-edition-d-d/318059-heart-matter.html#post5812527" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/forum/new-horizons-upcoming-edition-d-d/318059-heart-matter.html#post5812527</a>), I have started wondering if there would be a smooth way to make the two coexist:</p><p></p><p>- an AD&D-inspired ruleset where combat is broken down into long periods ("turns"), each of which is only summarized in terms of results, after the players declare what they generally want to do (including which spells to use), no battlemat is needed because movement and positions are not tracked carefully, and some dice is rolled to evaluate the outcome (damage taken, special injuries/conditions gained, number of foes eliminated)</p><p></p><p>- a 3ed/4ed-inspired ruleset using short periods ("rounds") and very detailed, with full use of distances and positioning, everybody personally declaring and handling each action one by one</p><p></p><p>With a good design, a turn could be made quite well equivalent to N rounds in terms of outcome and probability.</p><p></p><p>----</p><p></p><p>I am wondering whether such a setup could help me solve a typical problem I see with <em>adventure structure</em>: most of the adventures are designed to have an escalation of difficulties in the encounters, e.g. you are assaulting the dragon's lair, but first you fight some easy minions, then better minions, then the dragon's personal guards or second-in-command, and finally the BBEG. If you want the BBEG to be really better than his own minions, there are three cases:</p><p></p><p>a) early combats are trivial (bad), last combat is challenging (good)</p><p>b) early combats are challenging (good), last combat is impossible (bad)</p><p>c) early combats are challenging (good), last combat is challenging (good), because the PCs gain XP and level up between the early and last combats</p><p></p><p>Case c) is assumed in many printed adventures, but carries a consequence that I do not like: that the PCs must level up at a rate that is too fast for my tastes, sometimes repeatedly during the same dungeon crawl which takes place maybe in 1-2 days only (yikes!).</p><p></p><p>So maybe it would not be too bad to go back to case a), if trivial fights can be made very fast (a few minutes) to run using a turn-based combat ruleset, where you still have to make some tactical choice but coarse-grained instead of fine-grained. All that matters is maybe to know the significant bits of the outcome: perhaps after the first lesser encounter the Rogue is poisoned and the Cleric lost his weapon, during the second lesser encounter the Fighter's had to soak a lot more damage and needs healing while the Wizard had to blow one of his best spells, and so on...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 5814625, member: 1465"] This is something that never crossed my mind until this thread below :confused: [url]http://www.enworld.org/forum/new-horizons-upcoming-edition-d-d/318059-heart-matter.html[/url] Normally when we talk about modularity for combat rules, the purpose is to cater different groups/DM: those we always want it rules-light, and those who always want it rules-heavy. But how about using both? Would you like to have more than one way to skin a dragon? I mean, more than one ruleset for running combats (also against foes other than dragons) in the same campaign or adventure, i.e. a light ruleset for lesser combats and a heavy ruleset for more important fights? Would you be interested in two combat ruleset that would allow you to even switch between the two during the same encounter? Starting from my post in the thread above ([url]http://www.enworld.org/forum/new-horizons-upcoming-edition-d-d/318059-heart-matter.html#post5812527[/url]), I have started wondering if there would be a smooth way to make the two coexist: - an AD&D-inspired ruleset where combat is broken down into long periods ("turns"), each of which is only summarized in terms of results, after the players declare what they generally want to do (including which spells to use), no battlemat is needed because movement and positions are not tracked carefully, and some dice is rolled to evaluate the outcome (damage taken, special injuries/conditions gained, number of foes eliminated) - a 3ed/4ed-inspired ruleset using short periods ("rounds") and very detailed, with full use of distances and positioning, everybody personally declaring and handling each action one by one With a good design, a turn could be made quite well equivalent to N rounds in terms of outcome and probability. ---- I am wondering whether such a setup could help me solve a typical problem I see with [I]adventure structure[/I]: most of the adventures are designed to have an escalation of difficulties in the encounters, e.g. you are assaulting the dragon's lair, but first you fight some easy minions, then better minions, then the dragon's personal guards or second-in-command, and finally the BBEG. If you want the BBEG to be really better than his own minions, there are three cases: a) early combats are trivial (bad), last combat is challenging (good) b) early combats are challenging (good), last combat is impossible (bad) c) early combats are challenging (good), last combat is challenging (good), because the PCs gain XP and level up between the early and last combats Case c) is assumed in many printed adventures, but carries a consequence that I do not like: that the PCs must level up at a rate that is too fast for my tastes, sometimes repeatedly during the same dungeon crawl which takes place maybe in 1-2 days only (yikes!). So maybe it would not be too bad to go back to case a), if trivial fights can be made very fast (a few minutes) to run using a turn-based combat ruleset, where you still have to make some tactical choice but coarse-grained instead of fine-grained. All that matters is maybe to know the significant bits of the outcome: perhaps after the first lesser encounter the Rogue is poisoned and the Cleric lost his weapon, during the second lesser encounter the Fighter's had to soak a lot more damage and needs healing while the Wizard had to blow one of his best spells, and so on... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Would you use different combat rules in the same adventure?
Top