Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Wow, do I not understand Wildshape....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jgsugden" data-source="post: 1162555" data-attributes="member: 2629"><p>You have a very common opinion. The fact that it is commonly held, though, does not make it a fact.</p><p></p><p>There is *nothing* that legally binds WotC to issue errata or support their D&D products. They can publish a book and completely forget about it except for collecting profits. They issue errata and maintain their product because it is in their best interest. Not because they have a duty. They might say some pretty things about why they issue errata and make updates (and the people saying it might really believe it), but if it was in the best interests of the company to not maintain the product, somebody in a suit would prevent it.</p><p></p><p>As for Andy 'messing' up: If you'd be so kind as to explain, in detail, the workings of the WotC design teams, I'll consider your opinion. If you don't know how it works, you have no right to accuse one individual of being the source of problems. I know that Andy was responsible for a few concepts that have really improved the game. I know he played a key part in fixing problems that most players had not even recognized (ie; 3.0 power attack resulting in an average loss of 35% - 50% of expected damage for some characters because it didn't work properly). His conceptual additions to the game were marvelous. Some of the editing, play testing and fine tuning are less acceptable. I don't see his name under those credits. He was ultimately in charge of the entire PHB revision, but you can blame the 'boss' only so much for the failings of others. </p><p></p><p>And as for those people that did 'fail', they did not have unlimited time or resources. The 3.0 design process had many years more time to be developed. The 3.5 crew worked on a smaller scale with far fewer resources. Expecting perfection is unreasonable. Their efforts were not ideal, but they were far from horrible as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jgsugden, post: 1162555, member: 2629"] You have a very common opinion. The fact that it is commonly held, though, does not make it a fact. There is *nothing* that legally binds WotC to issue errata or support their D&D products. They can publish a book and completely forget about it except for collecting profits. They issue errata and maintain their product because it is in their best interest. Not because they have a duty. They might say some pretty things about why they issue errata and make updates (and the people saying it might really believe it), but if it was in the best interests of the company to not maintain the product, somebody in a suit would prevent it. As for Andy 'messing' up: If you'd be so kind as to explain, in detail, the workings of the WotC design teams, I'll consider your opinion. If you don't know how it works, you have no right to accuse one individual of being the source of problems. I know that Andy was responsible for a few concepts that have really improved the game. I know he played a key part in fixing problems that most players had not even recognized (ie; 3.0 power attack resulting in an average loss of 35% - 50% of expected damage for some characters because it didn't work properly). His conceptual additions to the game were marvelous. Some of the editing, play testing and fine tuning are less acceptable. I don't see his name under those credits. He was ultimately in charge of the entire PHB revision, but you can blame the 'boss' only so much for the failings of others. And as for those people that did 'fail', they did not have unlimited time or resources. The 3.0 design process had many years more time to be developed. The 3.5 crew worked on a smaller scale with far fewer resources. Expecting perfection is unreasonable. Their efforts were not ideal, but they were far from horrible as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Wow, do I not understand Wildshape....
Top