Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Writers strike is a go
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 3880761" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p>I disagree, but lets leave it at that.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>OK then we are miscommunicating.</p><p></p><p>Please post an article you have read, other than the one I linked to, that you think fairly represents the Producers side of this strike.</p><p></p><p>If you have not read an article, other than the one I posted, from the Producer's perspective, then say so. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In their discussions concerning the formula. The WGA went in asking for a rigid formula for internet royalties, but came out of the negotiations admitting the issue is far more complicated than that, since it doesn't allow any flexibility and could essentially eliminate some internet advertising for their own shows. What the formula will eventually end up looking like is yet to be seen of course, but I think both sides now know that it's going to be complex, and will have to deal with some hard accounting issues that have to take into consideration risks of illegal copying and distribution, free shows, cross-promotions, and all sorts of complex issues that makes a fixed formula a less than optimal solution.</p><p></p><p>While I come down slightly on the side of the writers in this debate, I do agree with the Producers on one key point - The writers should have started discussions 6 months ago when they were asked to, because this is a complex set of issues and trying to rush it at the last minute didn't have a great chance of success.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 3880761, member: 2525"] I disagree, but lets leave it at that. OK then we are miscommunicating. Please post an article you have read, other than the one I linked to, that you think fairly represents the Producers side of this strike. If you have not read an article, other than the one I posted, from the Producer's perspective, then say so. In their discussions concerning the formula. The WGA went in asking for a rigid formula for internet royalties, but came out of the negotiations admitting the issue is far more complicated than that, since it doesn't allow any flexibility and could essentially eliminate some internet advertising for their own shows. What the formula will eventually end up looking like is yet to be seen of course, but I think both sides now know that it's going to be complex, and will have to deal with some hard accounting issues that have to take into consideration risks of illegal copying and distribution, free shows, cross-promotions, and all sorts of complex issues that makes a fixed formula a less than optimal solution. While I come down slightly on the side of the writers in this debate, I do agree with the Producers on one key point - The writers should have started discussions 6 months ago when they were asked to, because this is a complex set of issues and trying to rush it at the last minute didn't have a great chance of success. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Writers strike is a go
Top