Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wrong thread location
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Epic Meepo" data-source="post: 9130484" data-attributes="member: 57073"><p>I agree with the title of this thread. The Thread Location rules in the latest playtest packet are clearly wrong. I don’t feel I’m being hyperbolic when I say the Thread Location rules are the worst design decision in the history of D&D. In fact, I’d even say they’re the worst design decision in the history of all games ever invented. I blame WotC, Crawford, and late-stage capitalism for this entire Thread Location debacle.</p><p></p><p>I’ve been playing D&D since three years before it was published. I’m not saying that to brag. I’m just saying it to explain where I’m coming from. And in all prior editions of D&D other than 4e, the DM was free to determine where Threads were located. Now, suddenly, WotC thinks we need fully fleshed-out rules for Thread Locations, like DMs aren’t able to make those decisions on their own. These new Thread Location mechanics reek of player entitlement.</p><p></p><p>If the playtest surveys weren’t a bunch of meaningless, non-scientific garbage, we’d have never gotten Thread Location mechanics in the first place. WotC keeps touting their arbitrary 70% satisfaction metric, as if numbers weren’t just tools corporate America invented to keep us from seeing the truth. The playtest methodology is flawed. I can't even offer explanations for my answers without choosing to type that information in the space provided. Total garbage.</p><p></p><p>I think we can all agree it’s WotC’s moral responsibility to remove unfortunate racist tropes from D&D. That’s long overdue. But now the half-elf is just a sidebar, yet we’re getting dedicated Thread Location mechanics! You know who doesn’t have a decades’ long history of using racially charged language to describe drow and orcs? Level Up. You know who also doesn’t have Thread Location mechanics? Level Up. I’m pretty sure you see where I’m going with this.</p><p></p><p>I came into this playtest excited about One D&D, but this one minor change to the rules has completely ruined my enthusiasm. This game is not living up to the personal house rules I fully wanted and expected WotC to publish on my behalf. I won’t be buying these new rulebooks. I’m done with One D&D. I’m not wasting any more headspace thinking about it. And I’ll be sure to post regularly between now and 2024 to remind everyone how little I'm dwelling on it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Epic Meepo, post: 9130484, member: 57073"] I agree with the title of this thread. The Thread Location rules in the latest playtest packet are clearly wrong. I don’t feel I’m being hyperbolic when I say the Thread Location rules are the worst design decision in the history of D&D. In fact, I’d even say they’re the worst design decision in the history of all games ever invented. I blame WotC, Crawford, and late-stage capitalism for this entire Thread Location debacle. I’ve been playing D&D since three years before it was published. I’m not saying that to brag. I’m just saying it to explain where I’m coming from. And in all prior editions of D&D other than 4e, the DM was free to determine where Threads were located. Now, suddenly, WotC thinks we need fully fleshed-out rules for Thread Locations, like DMs aren’t able to make those decisions on their own. These new Thread Location mechanics reek of player entitlement. If the playtest surveys weren’t a bunch of meaningless, non-scientific garbage, we’d have never gotten Thread Location mechanics in the first place. WotC keeps touting their arbitrary 70% satisfaction metric, as if numbers weren’t just tools corporate America invented to keep us from seeing the truth. The playtest methodology is flawed. I can't even offer explanations for my answers without choosing to type that information in the space provided. Total garbage. I think we can all agree it’s WotC’s moral responsibility to remove unfortunate racist tropes from D&D. That’s long overdue. But now the half-elf is just a sidebar, yet we’re getting dedicated Thread Location mechanics! You know who doesn’t have a decades’ long history of using racially charged language to describe drow and orcs? Level Up. You know who also doesn’t have Thread Location mechanics? Level Up. I’m pretty sure you see where I’m going with this. I came into this playtest excited about One D&D, but this one minor change to the rules has completely ruined my enthusiasm. This game is not living up to the personal house rules I fully wanted and expected WotC to publish on my behalf. I won’t be buying these new rulebooks. I’m done with One D&D. I’m not wasting any more headspace thinking about it. And I’ll be sure to post regularly between now and 2024 to remind everyone how little I'm dwelling on it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Wrong thread location
Top