Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Blue" data-source="post: 6863298" data-attributes="member: 20564">EXCELLENT IDEA.Considering that they have to delay projects when people get pulled off for jury duty, I don't think so.  Considering that PF has several multiples of amount of their staff and they don't do it, I really don't think so.Well, we can show you are wrong on the "never wanted do".  One of the first 4e books I got had a CD with demo tools on it.  It was years later but they did come out with a bunch of 4e tools.  So they did want to do it.Calling actual numbers a smokescreen is ... a smokescreen. Is that because they have a record of doing that?  Is it because they have staff that do that?  Considering how badly some of the tools have died (and even PF had theirs die), are you sure that they could have, and that what you call a "modest budget" wouldn't have impacted the rest of the game?Well, considering that 4e went through a character builder that had a months long bug fix list, and was months behind in implementing new features when anything new came out, it seems like doing it right and in an expandable way isn't easy.  Go ask the PCGen guys if their work was easy and something one guy could whip up in their basement.I'm glad you know why they are doing it.  Can you link the the conversation?  Was it one a panel, twitter, a video release?  Please give me ANYTHING that says this is what they are thinking and you didn't make this up.Okay, BS cut - that was a good idea.</blockquote>

Verification