Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WTF Wizards of the Coast? *RANT* (video link)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blue" data-source="post: 6863393" data-attributes="member: 20564"><p>Such as ad hominem attacks?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, I was <strong>clearly</strong> communicating anecdoal evidence. In every case I referred to "I", "me" and "my experience". I am unsure how you can read that and think it applies to everyone.</p><p></p><p>It looks like your second logical fallacy was to set up something I didn't say and claim I did in order to knock it down.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>That is also incorrect, but in this case your math is bad instead of having a logical fallacy. At $10/month subscription, and part of that offset by the other material in the magazines given, even if only one $30 sourcebook every few months was skipped, it was still a savings.</p><p></p><p>Oh wait, you're wrong another way. If ANY of the material was worthwhile, the subscription would get it for me vs. the purchase price. So I don't need the whole book to be good, just a part I wanted. For more information about my purchase patterns: I purchased SCAG for 5e and haven't cracked it open except to the character build options because I'm not playing FR right now.</p><p></p><p>So you were wrong twice there. I could count a third time that you don't get to judge <strong>for me</strong> what I felt like purchasing, but you've got so many clearly wrong statements that I won't confuse it with a fuzzy one.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Wow, another place you're wrong. I <strong>specifically</strong> pointed out that I was judging it from the publishing rate of the earlier edition.</p><p></p><p>Once I was already multiple months in an multiple books down, there would have been a debt to purchase all of thsoe books to get caught up.</p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>Well, something you said that isn't wrong. Well, perhaps wrong that WotC saw it as a viable business model so evidently some people wanted to, but considering the eventual backlash from it I'm inclined to let your statement stand.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Incorrect. Your math is correct this time, but the conclusion that their publishing model being bad means that their total content is bad is another fallacy. </p><p></p><p>Being able to pick and chose between all the books, having other tools that helped me at the table like the Compendium, all of the additional material in the magazines that I couldn't get without the subscription, having useful tools like the character builder, and having everything KEEP UP WITH 4e ERRATA - that can be worthwhile.</p><p></p><p>And in fact, I found it more worthwhile them buying any of the books that came out after I subscribed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blue, post: 6863393, member: 20564"] Such as ad hominem attacks? Yes, I was [B]clearly[/B] communicating anecdoal evidence. In every case I referred to "I", "me" and "my experience". I am unsure how you can read that and think it applies to everyone. It looks like your second logical fallacy was to set up something I didn't say and claim I did in order to knock it down. That is also incorrect, but in this case your math is bad instead of having a logical fallacy. At $10/month subscription, and part of that offset by the other material in the magazines given, even if only one $30 sourcebook every few months was skipped, it was still a savings. Oh wait, you're wrong another way. If ANY of the material was worthwhile, the subscription would get it for me vs. the purchase price. So I don't need the whole book to be good, just a part I wanted. For more information about my purchase patterns: I purchased SCAG for 5e and haven't cracked it open except to the character build options because I'm not playing FR right now. So you were wrong twice there. I could count a third time that you don't get to judge [B]for me[/B] what I felt like purchasing, but you've got so many clearly wrong statements that I won't confuse it with a fuzzy one. Wow, another place you're wrong. I [B]specifically[/B] pointed out that I was judging it from the publishing rate of the earlier edition. Once I was already multiple months in an multiple books down, there would have been a debt to purchase all of thsoe books to get caught up. Well, something you said that isn't wrong. Well, perhaps wrong that WotC saw it as a viable business model so evidently some people wanted to, but considering the eventual backlash from it I'm inclined to let your statement stand. Incorrect. Your math is correct this time, but the conclusion that their publishing model being bad means that their total content is bad is another fallacy. Being able to pick and chose between all the books, having other tools that helped me at the table like the Compendium, all of the additional material in the magazines that I couldn't get without the subscription, having useful tools like the character builder, and having everything KEEP UP WITH 4e ERRATA - that can be worthwhile. And in fact, I found it more worthwhile them buying any of the books that came out after I subscribed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WTF Wizards of the Coast? *RANT* (video link)
Top