Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
X2 *spoilers*
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DonAdam" data-source="post: 875934" data-attributes="member: 2446"><p>Sure, people make jokes in poor taste in those situations; but not Magneto. It was totally out of character.</p><p></p><p>The helmet comment, on the other hand, made perfect sense and was very funny.</p><p></p><p>Now, though, it's time for the rant about suspending disbelief:</p><p></p><p>I'm all for suspending disbelief. I'm watching a movie about mutants and superheroes.</p><p></p><p>However, all I ask for is consistency. The problem with Nightcrawler switching from teleporting blind to not doing it was the total lack of consistency with what I had accepted from the movie (in willing suspension of disbelief) before.</p><p></p><p>Some people say that suspension of disbelief also means I shouldn't worry about consistency. This is nonsense. If you cannot ground moments of tension in what is happening and has happened in the film and have to resort to constantly changing the rules, there is no basis for the tension. I have no reason to care about Jean sacrificing herself when I know she could have done the same thing from the cockpit.</p><p></p><p>And I don't go looking for inconsistencies. I've had people point them out in other movies such as the Matrix and Minority Report, but they were few and relatively subtle. But this movie kicked me in the face repeatedly with them, and at what were supposed to be terribly dramatic moments.</p><p></p><p>Compare this to the first film. Off the top of my head, I can't think of anything that wasn't consistent. It was very carefully constructed. Even the cartoon (from the early 90's, not that 90210 evolution nonsense) showed more careful plot construction than X2 did.</p><p></p><p>There is no reason to feel any tension or care at all about what's going on when the film makers are just going to fiat what happens left and right. That is very, very, very poor moviemaking.</p><p></p><p>Why did I pay the money? Because the first film, despite a few minor problems, did an amazing job and didn't have these issues.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DonAdam, post: 875934, member: 2446"] Sure, people make jokes in poor taste in those situations; but not Magneto. It was totally out of character. The helmet comment, on the other hand, made perfect sense and was very funny. Now, though, it's time for the rant about suspending disbelief: I'm all for suspending disbelief. I'm watching a movie about mutants and superheroes. However, all I ask for is consistency. The problem with Nightcrawler switching from teleporting blind to not doing it was the total lack of consistency with what I had accepted from the movie (in willing suspension of disbelief) before. Some people say that suspension of disbelief also means I shouldn't worry about consistency. This is nonsense. If you cannot ground moments of tension in what is happening and has happened in the film and have to resort to constantly changing the rules, there is no basis for the tension. I have no reason to care about Jean sacrificing herself when I know she could have done the same thing from the cockpit. And I don't go looking for inconsistencies. I've had people point them out in other movies such as the Matrix and Minority Report, but they were few and relatively subtle. But this movie kicked me in the face repeatedly with them, and at what were supposed to be terribly dramatic moments. Compare this to the first film. Off the top of my head, I can't think of anything that wasn't consistent. It was very carefully constructed. Even the cartoon (from the early 90's, not that 90210 evolution nonsense) showed more careful plot construction than X2 did. There is no reason to feel any tension or care at all about what's going on when the film makers are just going to fiat what happens left and right. That is very, very, very poor moviemaking. Why did I pay the money? Because the first film, despite a few minor problems, did an amazing job and didn't have these issues. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
X2 *spoilers*
Top