Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 7210972" data-attributes="member: 15700">This is definitely a risk.&nbsp; And I've seen it happen as well.&nbsp; People always want to complain about &quot;the worst&quot; class, which is certainly cyclical when the designers go on an arms race treadmill of constantly trying to &quot;fix&quot; things.IMO, there are two factors that really should be the most important1. First, realize that not every class is designed for you.&nbsp; You don't have to have every class appeal to your personal desires, and it doesn't mean the game is broken if they don't.&nbsp; Rather, what is important is if the fans of that class are dissatisfied.2. If there are significant numbers of fans dissatisfied, then it's worth revisiting.Based on those two things, and looking at the survey results we just had for example, then there is some sort of justification for revising the ranger and sorcerer classes.&nbsp; But that's it.&nbsp; Every other class came out pretty well.&nbsp; Any personal tweaks to those other classes would be better suited for an individual group to tweak them at their table.&nbsp; That way you can avoid the arms race you're talking about (and like you said, does happen).On a side note, I see a lot of people complaining frequently, but not a whole lot of solutions.&nbsp; If you (general you) think the sorcerer is so broken, where is your version?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sacrosanct, post: 7210972, member: 15700"] This is definitely a risk. And I've seen it happen as well. People always want to complain about "the worst" class, which is certainly cyclical when the designers go on an arms race treadmill of constantly trying to "fix" things. IMO, there are two factors that really should be the most important 1. First, realize that not every class is designed for you. You don't have to have every class appeal to your personal desires, and it doesn't mean the game is broken if they don't. Rather, what is important is if the fans of that class are dissatisfied. 2. If there are significant numbers of fans dissatisfied, then it's worth revisiting. Based on those two things, and looking at the survey results we just had for example, then there is some sort of justification for revising the ranger and sorcerer classes. But that's it. Every other class came out pretty well. Any personal tweaks to those other classes would be better suited for an individual group to tweak them at their table. That way you can avoid the arms race you're talking about (and like you said, does happen). On a side note, I see a lot of people complaining frequently, but not a whole lot of solutions. If you (general you) think the sorcerer is so broken, where is your version? [/QUOTE]

Verification