Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 7211731" data-attributes="member: 1465">This was the semi-official reason for removing bonus known spells, but honestly I didn't think it was a good reason.Because at the same time, it would have meant that more people would have chosen to play the Sorcerer in the first place! I don't know the statistics, but judging from forum discussions, people prefer to play Wizards and Warlocks because they don't feel the Sorcerer offers as much*. I would have rather let its 2 subclasses fade into obscurity (but then I don't think it would have really happened) than keep the whole class slightly underwhelming.*or they bring back that "this is good because it's good for beginners" (who don't understand their inferior choice) cr&pI am fine with not all elements being equally good, but classes are pretty much the central choice of the game, and as such they should always be "as equally good as possible". Well I really wouldn't want to go back to restrictions of that kind.Back to the OT... it's been known for months already that XGtE would have included a few subclasses from SCAG. The new knowledge is that the Swashbuckler is going to be corrected. That's not the same as revised, because Crawford clearly says it was an error. There is no indication that anything else in XGtE will be corrected, and much less revised.</blockquote>