Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Aldarc" data-source="post: 7212019" data-attributes="member: 5142">I don't know for sure, Jester David, what the acceptable margin is. I tend to be something of a Rawlsian looking for an evolving overlapping consensus. How about we discuss that politely and not in a manner that tries to shut down the conversation at the outset through needlessly aggressive rhetorical questions and strawmen? Because talking about the acceptable margin of balanced game options is a helluva lot more conducive for generating a productive discussion than claiming that others and I are arguing for the impossible endless cyle of "perfect balance." If you are on board with sharing your thoughts, in the context of 5E what are the parameters for the acceptable margin of balanced game options for you, Jester David? A new metamagic option could also work where you change the damage type of the spell, but that would also effectively be a tax, but one that could also help get around the sorcerer's more limited list of spells known.</blockquote>