Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Warmaster Horus" data-source="post: 7274117" data-attributes="member: 6785438">That's opinion, not fact.&nbsp; The issue is that this situation leads to people making assumptions, either correct or false.I have spellcasters in games that range from 9th to 19th level.&nbsp; And yeah, I've had it come up quite a bit (see my earlier post).And I've illustrated how it doesn't improve the game.&nbsp; WotC has already allowed this rule to be used in Adventurers' League if a DM sanctions it's use in their game, so yeah, it will be showing up for lots of players whether they want it or not.What about players/DMs using Counterspell in reaction to another Counterspell?&nbsp; I mean, one side casts a spell and the other side uses a reaction to immediately cast another spell.&nbsp; That second spell is going to be, in nearly all cases, Counterspell.&nbsp; So deciding to cast Counterspell against that is purely done from out-of-character knowledge of how spellcasting works in D&amp;D.&nbsp; AKA, Metagaming.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Warmaster Horus, post: 7274117, member: 6785438"] That's opinion, not fact. The issue is that this situation leads to people making assumptions, either correct or false. I have spellcasters in games that range from 9th to 19th level. And yeah, I've had it come up quite a bit (see my earlier post). And I've illustrated how it doesn't improve the game. WotC has already allowed this rule to be used in Adventurers' League if a DM sanctions it's use in their game, so yeah, it will be showing up for lots of players whether they want it or not. What about players/DMs using Counterspell in reaction to another Counterspell? I mean, one side casts a spell and the other side uses a reaction to immediately cast another spell. That second spell is going to be, in nearly all cases, Counterspell. So deciding to cast Counterspell against that is purely done from out-of-character knowledge of how spellcasting works in D&D. AKA, Metagaming. [/QUOTE]

Verification