Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
XP spreading...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 5206723" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>Rating and voting systems have meaning <em>only if</em> they have structure, and if folks use that structure in their rating/voting strategy. If you fail to work with the structure, that will result in your votes meaning less.</p><p></p><p>In this case, the behavior you're describing is exactly the stuff that makes your votes have less meaning in the structure. You give an XP because you really like one post. You see another post by the same person, and want to give another XP. So, you lay about you to "burn through the buffer" as you put it. In that process, you devalue your first point. So, why in heaven's name are you doing that?</p><p></p><p>The system is currently designed to show <em>breadth</em> of appeal, not depth. You already said you liked the person's post. That you like seventeen other of their posts is not really what the system is measuring - you liked the one, <em>we already know</em> you're going to tend to like other posts by that same poster. </p><p></p><p>If a person has 20 XP now, it more or less means that his posts were liked by something like 20 people. That five people liked him a whole lot is not something the system is intended to display. Trying to force it to display depth when it isn't intended to is what makes your votes have much less meaning in the system.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 5206723, member: 177"] Rating and voting systems have meaning [I]only if[/I] they have structure, and if folks use that structure in their rating/voting strategy. If you fail to work with the structure, that will result in your votes meaning less. In this case, the behavior you're describing is exactly the stuff that makes your votes have less meaning in the structure. You give an XP because you really like one post. You see another post by the same person, and want to give another XP. So, you lay about you to "burn through the buffer" as you put it. In that process, you devalue your first point. So, why in heaven's name are you doing that? The system is currently designed to show [i]breadth[/i] of appeal, not depth. You already said you liked the person's post. That you like seventeen other of their posts is not really what the system is measuring - you liked the one, [I]we already know[/I] you're going to tend to like other posts by that same poster. If a person has 20 XP now, it more or less means that his posts were liked by something like 20 people. That five people liked him a whole lot is not something the system is intended to display. Trying to force it to display depth when it isn't intended to is what makes your votes have much less meaning in the system. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
XP spreading...
Top