Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
XP Value for Monsters?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ilgatto" data-source="post: 9805732" data-attributes="member: 86051"><p>Sorry about the delay, but I've been trying to get my head around a new approach to the phenomenon of "special attacks" and how they are listed in the XPV table in the DMG and Appendix E, which may well have consequences for what, exactly, a "special defense" is, and how it should be rewarded. </p><p>Though that hasn't really gotten me anywhere regarding the xp values in Appendix E, it has allowed me to read it in a way that suddenly made a lot more sense to me than it has ever done. Could be me, of course, but I do now believe that maybe they actually <em><strong>were</strong></em> thinking something when they made that Appendix!</p><p></p><p>Anyway.</p><p></p><p>So, first, the "damage reduction" in the table I cobbled together refers to a monster suffering less damage from some weapons than usual (in the case of the wraith, that would be 1/2 damage from silver weapons). Because I couldn't upload the full table, I've had to delete most "non-immunities/resistances" from it. So there's no "magic to hits" in it. <em>Mille excuses</em> for that.</p><p></p><p>Second, I agree that all non-blanket MR <strong>resistances</strong> should probably be one SAXPB <em>(e.g.,</em> damage reduction, resistant to cold, etc.).</p><p>Not so sure about always heaping the immunities together in one SAXPB, though, for there's the golems and the rakshasa, which are immune to just about all spells, and which should surely be worth EAXPAs?</p><p></p><p>And then there's the question of what "immune to cold" means in practice. I'd say that a lot of that depends on whether one rules that, for example, a white dragon's breath weapon, the ice toad's cold blast are "magical effects".</p><p>If they are not, then "immune to cold" probably means "immune to spells that inflict cold damage", which would mean that it falls in the "all spell immunities are just an SAXPB" category.</p><p>If they are magical effects, then immune to cold should probably be an SAXPB in its own right?</p><p>And how does the "freezing" attack of the brown mold fit into all this?</p><p>Brain = frozen. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":eek:" title="Eek! :eek:" data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":eek:" /></p><p></p><p>Also, the wraith example does not solve the problem of the triton leader vs the gelatinous cube:</p><p></p><p>SA - immune to various spells and their effects</p><p>SA - immune to electricity</p><p>SA - immune to paralyzation</p><p>SA - resistant to cold (resistances to certain specific spells or effects or elements)</p><p></p><p>That still leaves it with +100 xp vs the +65 xp of the triton leader.</p><p>I guess a lot will depend on whether one decides that all cold-, fire-, etc., effects worth their salt are actually "magical effects" (breath weapons, undead cold touch, salamder heat touch, whip & flame ttack of the type VI demon). If they are, then the gelatinous cube's "elemental" immunities and resistances could all be heaped together under "immune to various spells and their effects", for:</p><p></p><p>SA - immune or resistant to various spells and their effects (specific spells or effects or elements)</p><p>SA - immune to paralyzation</p><p></p><p>Which would leave it with +50 xp vs the +65 xp of the triton leader.</p><p></p><p>In fact, as much as this is more or less suggested in Dragon #89, which, IIRC, even goes further and also heaps immunity to magical attacks <em>(e.g.,</em> paralyzation) under "any immunity or resistance". But then, that article also sticks to the "magic resistance as EAXPA rules"-rule.</p><p></p><p>Should there be some turning point when "many, many immunities" simple become an EAXPA?</p><p></p><p>Should we treat certain categories of monsters that are immune to a lot as just getting an EAXPA for that?</p><p>Undead? Yup, immune to a lot, so EAXPA.</p><p>Devils, demons? EAXPA. Magic resistant, you say? Here's <em><strong>another</strong></em> EAXPA!</p><p>Any creature with an "alien physiology", such as a gelatinous cube or a black pudding? EAXPA.</p><p></p><p>Problem here is that that kind of thinking sort of started happening only after 1E.</p><p></p><p>Hmm... and is that the siren's call of 3E I hear over yonder horizon?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ilgatto, post: 9805732, member: 86051"] Sorry about the delay, but I've been trying to get my head around a new approach to the phenomenon of "special attacks" and how they are listed in the XPV table in the DMG and Appendix E, which may well have consequences for what, exactly, a "special defense" is, and how it should be rewarded. Though that hasn't really gotten me anywhere regarding the xp values in Appendix E, it has allowed me to read it in a way that suddenly made a lot more sense to me than it has ever done. Could be me, of course, but I do now believe that maybe they actually [I][B]were[/B][/I] thinking something when they made that Appendix! Anyway. So, first, the "damage reduction" in the table I cobbled together refers to a monster suffering less damage from some weapons than usual (in the case of the wraith, that would be 1/2 damage from silver weapons). Because I couldn't upload the full table, I've had to delete most "non-immunities/resistances" from it. So there's no "magic to hits" in it. [I]Mille excuses[/I] for that. Second, I agree that all non-blanket MR [B]resistances[/B] should probably be one SAXPB [I](e.g.,[/I] damage reduction, resistant to cold, etc.). Not so sure about always heaping the immunities together in one SAXPB, though, for there's the golems and the rakshasa, which are immune to just about all spells, and which should surely be worth EAXPAs? And then there's the question of what "immune to cold" means in practice. I'd say that a lot of that depends on whether one rules that, for example, a white dragon's breath weapon, the ice toad's cold blast are "magical effects". If they are not, then "immune to cold" probably means "immune to spells that inflict cold damage", which would mean that it falls in the "all spell immunities are just an SAXPB" category. If they are magical effects, then immune to cold should probably be an SAXPB in its own right? And how does the "freezing" attack of the brown mold fit into all this? Brain = frozen. :eek: Also, the wraith example does not solve the problem of the triton leader vs the gelatinous cube: SA - immune to various spells and their effects SA - immune to electricity SA - immune to paralyzation SA - resistant to cold (resistances to certain specific spells or effects or elements) That still leaves it with +100 xp vs the +65 xp of the triton leader. I guess a lot will depend on whether one decides that all cold-, fire-, etc., effects worth their salt are actually "magical effects" (breath weapons, undead cold touch, salamder heat touch, whip & flame ttack of the type VI demon). If they are, then the gelatinous cube's "elemental" immunities and resistances could all be heaped together under "immune to various spells and their effects", for: SA - immune or resistant to various spells and their effects (specific spells or effects or elements) SA - immune to paralyzation Which would leave it with +50 xp vs the +65 xp of the triton leader. In fact, as much as this is more or less suggested in Dragon #89, which, IIRC, even goes further and also heaps immunity to magical attacks [I](e.g.,[/I] paralyzation) under "any immunity or resistance". But then, that article also sticks to the "magic resistance as EAXPA rules"-rule. Should there be some turning point when "many, many immunities" simple become an EAXPA? Should we treat certain categories of monsters that are immune to a lot as just getting an EAXPA for that? Undead? Yup, immune to a lot, so EAXPA. Devils, demons? EAXPA. Magic resistant, you say? Here's [I][B]another[/B][/I] EAXPA! Any creature with an "alien physiology", such as a gelatinous cube or a black pudding? EAXPA. Problem here is that that kind of thinking sort of started happening only after 1E. Hmm... and is that the siren's call of 3E I hear over yonder horizon? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
XP Value for Monsters?
Top