Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Nifft" data-source="post: 1487502" data-attributes="member: 6562">Exactly! To compensate. So glad you agree. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Remember that many Metapsionic Feats are going to be useless to them -- what's the point of Empower or Maxamize when you have no damaging effects?I'd rather cut some of the [Psionic] feats than the specific [General] feats that I've enumerated. If you can think of any specific ones that are "too powerful", or against the flavor, please let us know.I disagree. I think that a skill monkey (Rogue, Ranger, Monk, Mind Thief) should be able to do some combat tricks. Spring Attack is a good chain, as are the ranged attack feats, and neither is overpowered. (Especially not compared to two-handed Power Attack + True Strike, or Blink + Sneak Attack. Those are the "gold standard".)Exactly! They're intended to use the bonus feats & powers to be useful in combat, as opposed to relying only on Sneak Attack and Tumble (and high-level Rogue Special Abilities).The Mind Rogue should be exactly as good as a Rogue. And as good as a Bard. And as good as a Ranger. And as good as a Sorcerer. That's balance. -- N</blockquote>