Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
[yb2-meta] Generator Talk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="reiella" data-source="post: 73682" data-attributes="member: 160"><p>Well Vanor, there have been comments both ways.</p><p></p><p>And even if you do feel it is fine, then show up if only for stating that, and there could well instances that are not to your liking that you didn't realize, or more people who dislike some of the potential.</p><p></p><p>As for dragon, in one way a good example, but also poor, since dragon does actually currently have a mirror in the defensive table, and many other styles do as well in fact... I think that more some are concerned that some styles may be not represented in the nouns table (for defensive structures), thus making them 'more powerful', or that some styles just seem to lack a defensive state. And no, in the last generator it was not decided that the defensive nouns would be not related to the styles because of confusion. It was decided they would not explicitly state the styles (or locations)... Not items related <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />, or else we wouldn't have cat, weapon (wide variety of weapon based 'defenses'), snow, stars, steel, four winds, root, willow, wyrm, air, bamboo, leaf, amphibian, ape, bird, canine, reptile, rodent, vermin...</p><p></p><p>Oi fun, another duplicated entry in the noun table (willow).</p><p></p><p>In most there is little I care either way about, but I've seen enough comments being made at least in the chat to be concerned about it. And it is easier to have a discussion (especially one with arguments or disputes) over a chat session than over the boards with lag time and less immediate conversation.</p><p></p><p>The oddities of the past talk came about simply from a few quotes and a few people agreeing that there were some oddities were a bit much, the specifics of the changes were decided in the chat room (notably compressing the verb table down significantly along with a few other target lists).</p><p></p><p>Will bother to mention that beyond any sort of discussion, anything that would have a rules based result will just end up with a post here making some suggestions with observations...</p><p></p><p>Also Diamond, sorry ya won't be able, but post your schedule all the same. Will see how the number of people willing to actually consider the generator and when they can show.</p><p></p><p>[ Add ]</p><p>In all, if you are interested, post your timeframe. So we can arrange sometime for it.</p><p></p><p>Also sorry for coming off as forceful and aggressive on this as I have, but it seems to be the only way I can get comments at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="reiella, post: 73682, member: 160"] Well Vanor, there have been comments both ways. And even if you do feel it is fine, then show up if only for stating that, and there could well instances that are not to your liking that you didn't realize, or more people who dislike some of the potential. As for dragon, in one way a good example, but also poor, since dragon does actually currently have a mirror in the defensive table, and many other styles do as well in fact... I think that more some are concerned that some styles may be not represented in the nouns table (for defensive structures), thus making them 'more powerful', or that some styles just seem to lack a defensive state. And no, in the last generator it was not decided that the defensive nouns would be not related to the styles because of confusion. It was decided they would not explicitly state the styles (or locations)... Not items related :), or else we wouldn't have cat, weapon (wide variety of weapon based 'defenses'), snow, stars, steel, four winds, root, willow, wyrm, air, bamboo, leaf, amphibian, ape, bird, canine, reptile, rodent, vermin... Oi fun, another duplicated entry in the noun table (willow). In most there is little I care either way about, but I've seen enough comments being made at least in the chat to be concerned about it. And it is easier to have a discussion (especially one with arguments or disputes) over a chat session than over the boards with lag time and less immediate conversation. The oddities of the past talk came about simply from a few quotes and a few people agreeing that there were some oddities were a bit much, the specifics of the changes were decided in the chat room (notably compressing the verb table down significantly along with a few other target lists). Will bother to mention that beyond any sort of discussion, anything that would have a rules based result will just end up with a post here making some suggestions with observations... Also Diamond, sorry ya won't be able, but post your schedule all the same. Will see how the number of people willing to actually consider the generator and when they can show. [ Add ] In all, if you are interested, post your timeframe. So we can arrange sometime for it. Also sorry for coming off as forceful and aggressive on this as I have, but it seems to be the only way I can get comments at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
[yb2-meta] Generator Talk
Top