Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Phoenix8008" data-source="post: 1371907" data-attributes="member: 211">Kal, the last thing I intended was the need to re-write the paths you guys had already come up with. Was there something inherently unbalancing to some paths in dealing with this knock-out thing that I didn't see?&nbsp;I saw this as more of an add-on to what was already there, not a new base to build the rules atop of. I only hope that the reason you'd rather change what's already done is that my idea sparked some good interest or ideas for you. Who knows, maybe this much of&nbsp; a change could be a good thing for YB though. Make it not so like the earlier versions. Is that a good thing? Hopefully.&nbsp;Anyway, I don't know what I'm talking about anymore. I'm tired. Just not used to people jumping at my ideas like that. Back when YB2 was being worked up and I suggested things, it never went well, I felt.&nbsp;Gotta run. C-ya in the chat rooms hopefully now that I have MIRC again.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Phoenix8008, post: 1371907, member: 211"] Kal, the last thing I intended was the need to re-write the paths you guys had already come up with. Was there something inherently unbalancing to some paths in dealing with this knock-out thing that I didn't see? I saw this as more of an add-on to what was already there, not a new base to build the rules atop of. I only hope that the reason you'd rather change what's already done is that my idea sparked some good interest or ideas for you. Who knows, maybe this much of a change could be a good thing for YB though. Make it not so like the earlier versions. Is that a good thing? Hopefully. Anyway, I don't know what I'm talking about anymore. I'm tired. Just not used to people jumping at my ideas like that. Back when YB2 was being worked up and I suggested things, it never went well, I felt. Gotta run. C-ya in the chat rooms hopefully now that I have MIRC again. [/QUOTE]

Verification