Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Iku Rex" data-source="post: 3212428" data-attributes="member: 752">It is no more ridiculous than allowing someone to use secondary natural attacks in the same round as they're getting multiple attacks from a high BAB with unarmed strikes and/or using two-weapon fighting with unarmed strikes.No it's not. No, because the feat specifically states that you must give up your regular attacks (the attacks you could have made had you not chosen to use the feat) and it is quite clear from the context that extra attacks granted by other feats and abilities are lost for the round. (They even use cleave as an example...)Even if it wasn't that would simply mean that Whirlwind Attack was in need of clarification. It would prove nothing.  I take it you believe that we HAVE TO rule that anyone using a spiked chain will get a +2 bonus on all disarm attempts made in the round, even with different weapons (such as secondary natural attacks)? After all: "When using a spiked chain, you get a +2 bonus on opposed attack rolls made to disarm an opponent (including the roll to avoid being disarmed if such an attempt fails)."And we HAVE TO rule that you don't get iterative attacks from a high BAB if you make secondary natural attacks? After all: "Creatures do not receive additional attacks from a high base attack bonus when using natural weapons".</blockquote>