Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Arnwyn" data-source="post: 1811390" data-attributes="member: 7701">I have to say, I'm pretty much apathetic to both the original letter and the Dragon Mag. editors' response.Frankly, I don't care if we get more youth into the game/hobby. I couldn't care less. That's certainly not a factor in any decisions I make about the game. And really... why should it be? So the hobby won't &quot;die&quot;? As if I care.The gaming police aren't going to come and take away my books if the hobby &quot;dies&quot;. And I'm only interested in playing with close friends, so I don't care about the recruitment of already knowledgeable players.Really, if the goal of &quot;getting more youth into the hobby&quot; results in a bunch of books for beginners and not a lot of books that I'm interested in (which, based on the results of such books that have come out, seems to be true), then that goal is, in fact, a bad one. (For me, duh.)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Arnwyn, post: 1811390, member: 7701"] I have to say, I'm pretty much apathetic to both the original letter and the Dragon Mag. editors' response. Frankly, I don't care if we get more youth into the game/hobby. I couldn't care less. That's certainly not a factor in any decisions I make about the game. And really... why should it be? So the hobby won't "die"? As if I care. The gaming police aren't going to come and take away my books if the hobby "dies". And I'm only interested in playing with close friends, so I don't care about the recruitment of already knowledgeable players. Really, if the goal of "getting more youth into the hobby" results in a bunch of books for beginners and not a lot of books that I'm interested in (which, based on the results of such books that have come out, seems to be true), then that goal is, in fact, a [i]bad[/i] one. (For me, duh.) [/QUOTE]

Verification