Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Yeenoghu writeup
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ripzerai" data-source="post: 2880574" data-attributes="member: 38324"><p>That's pretty vague. Do you have an example of the sort of "circumstances" that could allow a number of demons to gain stations well above their ability level, and an entire class of other demons to stay below theirs? Being born rich and going to good colleges aren't going to help demons much.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think you have a different definition of "reasoning" than I do. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, I'm saying that political <em>ability</em> comes from personal ability.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, it means that Joseph Kennedy got his son elected President because he was ruthless, a clever businessman, and had great networking skills, and because his son was charismatic and a good speaker, with the foresight to have a respectable book ghostwritten for him.</p><p></p><p>If you're saying that Yeenoghu's success is due more to having smart campaign managers than any charisma or skill of his own, one must wonder what his campaign managers need him for, if they're so smart and their strength and hit dice don't matter. This is the <em>Abyss</em> we're talking about, a place where murdering your boss to get ahead is perfectly acceptable. </p><p></p><p>Analogies with real world aren't going to apply.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, "passive-aggressive" is the perfect phrase to describe what I was talking about, and it has nothing to do with "inner children." </p><p></p><p>A balor says to a marilith, "Hey, what are we following this mook around for? He's little more than a beast, not a sophisticated sort like us."</p><p></p><p>The marilith says, "You're right. Let's stop molesting nuns and eating babies for a bit, go round up a bunch of allies, and confront him."</p><p></p><p>They go to Yeenoghu's throne, and they're all Hostile. Yeenoghu rolls an intimidate check. He succeeds, and they're all reduced to Unfriendly. They decide not to attack him, but things are still tense. </p><p></p><p>They leave, and their reactions automatically go back to Hostile. That's how the skill works. So they go out and, rather than confront the intimidating demon prince, they set fire to his palace and slaughter his remaining allies elsewhere.</p><p></p><p>That's passive-aggressive, by definition. No inner-children to be seen, and if Yeenoghu thinks something's wrong with them he's too dead to say so.</p><p></p><p><em>That's</em> why Intimidate isn't a very good skill for use in politics, and <em>that's</em> why "passive-aggressive" is the perfect way to describe what happens to enemies who you use it against. They're passive, because they're Intimidated. They're aggressive, because the side-effect of the skill is it leaves them with a grudge. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Damn straight there is, but those with higher skills are going to be more successful <em>consistently</em> than those who don't. Yeenoghu's not going to be an Abyssal lord for any length of time, and silly Kennedy analogies aren't going to change this (are you talking about politics in the Abyss or the United States?). Even if Yeenoghu's dad is going to <em>eat</em> him as soon as help him unless he gets a few more ranks in diplomacy, bootlegger or no.</p><p></p><p>How, then, does an Abyssal lord manage to rule for more than a few years at a time? By having the skills and prowess to back up their rhetoric. An unadvanced balor has a superior combination of these qualities than Yeenoghu does; I think he'd make a very effective bodyguard for one, but campaign-ending ubervillain? No. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The flavor text says that balors are charismatic, relatively disciplined, and prone to taking charge, which was my point. In 1e, Yeenoghu had only one advantage over them: he was physically a lot more powerful (in fact, he was a lesser deity). This doesn't mean he's going to have to constantly fight every demon in the Abyss to prove that (silly); it just means that he's going to have to be able to prove his prowess to those around him. <em>Continuously</em>. The argument that he can use alliances and fear to do the same thing fails with the current stats, where he lacks both the prowess or the skills to do so. </p><p></p><p>Do I agree with your basic point, which is that a demon can control demons of equal power? Sure, theoretically. Could this possibly work with the current stat blocks, and the current group of contenders (Yeenoghu and balor)? Absolutely not, and it's pointless to pretend otherwise.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ripzerai, post: 2880574, member: 38324"] That's pretty vague. Do you have an example of the sort of "circumstances" that could allow a number of demons to gain stations well above their ability level, and an entire class of other demons to stay below theirs? Being born rich and going to good colleges aren't going to help demons much. I think you have a different definition of "reasoning" than I do. No, I'm saying that political [i]ability[/i] comes from personal ability. No, it means that Joseph Kennedy got his son elected President because he was ruthless, a clever businessman, and had great networking skills, and because his son was charismatic and a good speaker, with the foresight to have a respectable book ghostwritten for him. If you're saying that Yeenoghu's success is due more to having smart campaign managers than any charisma or skill of his own, one must wonder what his campaign managers need him for, if they're so smart and their strength and hit dice don't matter. This is the [i]Abyss[/i] we're talking about, a place where murdering your boss to get ahead is perfectly acceptable. Analogies with real world aren't going to apply. No, "passive-aggressive" is the perfect phrase to describe what I was talking about, and it has nothing to do with "inner children." A balor says to a marilith, "Hey, what are we following this mook around for? He's little more than a beast, not a sophisticated sort like us." The marilith says, "You're right. Let's stop molesting nuns and eating babies for a bit, go round up a bunch of allies, and confront him." They go to Yeenoghu's throne, and they're all Hostile. Yeenoghu rolls an intimidate check. He succeeds, and they're all reduced to Unfriendly. They decide not to attack him, but things are still tense. They leave, and their reactions automatically go back to Hostile. That's how the skill works. So they go out and, rather than confront the intimidating demon prince, they set fire to his palace and slaughter his remaining allies elsewhere. That's passive-aggressive, by definition. No inner-children to be seen, and if Yeenoghu thinks something's wrong with them he's too dead to say so. [i]That's[/i] why Intimidate isn't a very good skill for use in politics, and [i]that's[/i] why "passive-aggressive" is the perfect way to describe what happens to enemies who you use it against. They're passive, because they're Intimidated. They're aggressive, because the side-effect of the skill is it leaves them with a grudge. Damn straight there is, but those with higher skills are going to be more successful [i]consistently[/i] than those who don't. Yeenoghu's not going to be an Abyssal lord for any length of time, and silly Kennedy analogies aren't going to change this (are you talking about politics in the Abyss or the United States?). Even if Yeenoghu's dad is going to [i]eat[/i] him as soon as help him unless he gets a few more ranks in diplomacy, bootlegger or no. How, then, does an Abyssal lord manage to rule for more than a few years at a time? By having the skills and prowess to back up their rhetoric. An unadvanced balor has a superior combination of these qualities than Yeenoghu does; I think he'd make a very effective bodyguard for one, but campaign-ending ubervillain? No. The flavor text says that balors are charismatic, relatively disciplined, and prone to taking charge, which was my point. In 1e, Yeenoghu had only one advantage over them: he was physically a lot more powerful (in fact, he was a lesser deity). This doesn't mean he's going to have to constantly fight every demon in the Abyss to prove that (silly); it just means that he's going to have to be able to prove his prowess to those around him. [i]Continuously[/i]. The argument that he can use alliances and fear to do the same thing fails with the current stats, where he lacks both the prowess or the skills to do so. Do I agree with your basic point, which is that a demon can control demons of equal power? Sure, theoretically. Could this possibly work with the current stat blocks, and the current group of contenders (Yeenoghu and balor)? Absolutely not, and it's pointless to pretend otherwise. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Yeenoghu writeup
Top