Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jfdlsjfd" data-source="post: 8487649" data-attributes="member: 42856">That's was one of the question I always wonder.... If you are in an society, that say in this case that Inquisitors have the right to try people on the spot, do not need to hear the accused, do not need evidence, can pass judgment on the spot as a single sitting judge and without appeal, are you supposed to loyal-neutrally embrace this job because "that's the law"? The NPC in case is certainly a jerk, but he's obviously empowered to do that by the lawful ruler of the land... The designers obviously thought that when procedures are blatantly wrong, but legal, a LN character would follow them [I didn't get the feeling he was having a blast burning people at the stake, he was just doing his best to protect his country against the demonic threat, much like McCarthy acted against the communists, except demons are real  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> ].Mmmm, I won't spoil you if you didn't finish the game but... [spoiler]the obvious romantic interest for a guy will shed some light about this[/spoiler]</blockquote>