Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Yes to factionalism. No to racism.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 8488223" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>The player Evil options are definitely of the very "Man what? Why would I ever do that entirely counterproductive and insane thing?! type. There's a lot of randomly attacking people, encouraging pointless murders and so on.</p><p></p><p>Regill is clearly not from that school, but more the opportunistic, self-denying/closeted kind of Evil (which isn't available to the PC). He reminds me a bit of the guy from the Villain's Handbook, dude with the dogs.</p><p></p><p>PF:WotR is a tremendous illustration of why "mechanical" alignment is a bad idea though. The best example is trying to play LG. Many of the Lawful choices early in the game, for some reason border on or indeed are Lawful Evil (even if the game just says they're "Lawful"). Some are outright sadistic stuff that Judge Dredd would blanche at and labelled as Lawful. But if you don't pick a bunch of those, and just pick stuff labelled Good, your alignment will drift from LG to NG, potentially before the end of the first act.</p><p></p><p>Whilst the dialogue options in WotR (unlike KM) are all labelled just Good, Evil, Lawful, Chaotic, they're actually NG, NE, LN and CN (mechanically), and it's just hiding that. And the writing makes Evil and Lawful very frequently look like Chaotic Evil and Lawful Evil respectively (for the player). They say they were trying to improve things by doing it this way but I think it makes it worse.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 8488223, member: 18"] The player Evil options are definitely of the very "Man what? Why would I ever do that entirely counterproductive and insane thing?! type. There's a lot of randomly attacking people, encouraging pointless murders and so on. Regill is clearly not from that school, but more the opportunistic, self-denying/closeted kind of Evil (which isn't available to the PC). He reminds me a bit of the guy from the Villain's Handbook, dude with the dogs. PF:WotR is a tremendous illustration of why "mechanical" alignment is a bad idea though. The best example is trying to play LG. Many of the Lawful choices early in the game, for some reason border on or indeed are Lawful Evil (even if the game just says they're "Lawful"). Some are outright sadistic stuff that Judge Dredd would blanche at and labelled as Lawful. But if you don't pick a bunch of those, and just pick stuff labelled Good, your alignment will drift from LG to NG, potentially before the end of the first act. Whilst the dialogue options in WotR (unlike KM) are all labelled just Good, Evil, Lawful, Chaotic, they're actually NG, NE, LN and CN (mechanically), and it's just hiding that. And the writing makes Evil and Lawful very frequently look like Chaotic Evil and Lawful Evil respectively (for the player). They say they were trying to improve things by doing it this way but I think it makes it worse. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Yes to factionalism. No to racism.
Top