Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
(Yet another) D&D Movie Speculation thread.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jester David" data-source="post: 7542438" data-attributes="member: 37579"><p>Let's not get political here. Anytime people bring up "the Left" or "the Right" is never a good sign for the health of a thread. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Or <em>Gods of Egypt</em> that had a predominantly white cast, even for the Egyptian gods. Or <em>Exodus: Gods and Kings</em>.</p><p></p><p><em>The Wall</em> wasn't as bad, but came at the wrong time. There were a couple other examples that year, so it became "the third in the list". Really, <em>The Wall</em> is more an example of the white saviour, where a white dude has to come in and save the day. But, when watching the movie, that movie was much more of an ensemble piece with white and Chinese heroes. And it doesn't work as well without the outsider, as you need them to serve as the audience proxy when explaining the backstory. </p><p></p><p>Anyhoo, that's off topic. </p><p>I agree that you should cast actors based on their ability. And, as you say, with obvious exceptions for historical figures. Or real people and not just historical figures, because someone shouldn't have to be "historical" to be played by someone of the same ethnicity. </p><p> </p><p>But there's the two other topics that smash into that. As OB1 says, there's <strong>whitewashing</strong>, where you give a part to a white actor rather than a minority or person of colour. Typically casting a white actor as a non-white historical figure.</p><p>This wouldn't necessarily apply here for the drow anymore than it would apply for Klingons in Star Trek. The make-up erases the ethnicity and doesn't match to a real person. Kruge wasn't a real historical person so it's not an issue to have him played by a white actor. And since the Klingons were effectively stand-ins for Russians in the political narrative, it very much was not whitewashing...</p><p></p><p>The bigger issue is <strong>blackface</strong>. Casting white actors and painting their face black. Which ties into a whole lot of minstrel culture and mocking of African Americans in theatres for the entertainment of whites, and in a modern sense also invokes cultural appropriation. </p><p>It's a messy thorny issue. </p><p>Now, you can cast white people as dark-skinned non-people. Again, see the Klingons for an example for how it can work without upsetting people. Because it's a very different culture and not associated with any minstrel tropes. </p><p></p><p>The third issue is casting black people as "the bad guy". This is the more problematic issue for the movie. Because fantasy tends to take place in a very whitewashed Eurocentric world. And thus the "good guys" tend to be Caucasian and the monstrous, savage villains tend to be dark skinned. </p><p>Dark as evil is a pretty old concept that doesn't really match to racism. Black being evil can be found worldwide. Light/ dark dualism is big in Zoroastrianism, which is from the Middle East region. Japan has the ying-yang. So presenting the bad guy as dark skinned (like the orcs in <em>Lord of the Rings</em>) isn't intentionally racist. </p><p>Buuut...</p><p>When when the 20% of North American audiences watch the film and don't see anyone that looks like them as a "good guy" and the only people remotely like them are "monstrous bad guys" that makes them uneasy. Even if they're a unnatural dark grey colour (like the orcs). It feeds into a problematic narrative. Like how the only Middle Eastern characters in action movies are terrorists. </p><p>Again, you can have the bad guys as dark skinned without a problem, if there are also people of colour on the side of the angels.</p><p>Going for the Star Trek hat trick, it doesn't matter if the Klingons are evil and dark skinned. Because the <em>Enterprise </em>has a diverse multiracial crew. Black people watching the show wouldn't see the Klingons and bad guys as the only people that looked like them. </p><p></p><p></p><p>The evil army works nicely because it allows an extended action sequence for the climax where the team of heroes all fight waves of mooks. A battle sequence with a group of people against one person requires a lot more coordination and choreographing. </p><p>But a big monster would be easier. </p><p></p><p>Really... the big bad of the movie <em>needs</em> to be a dragon. The D&D movie absolutely needs a dungeon and dragon. And having a pitched epic battle against a dragon would be fun.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jester David, post: 7542438, member: 37579"] Let's not get political here. Anytime people bring up "the Left" or "the Right" is never a good sign for the health of a thread. Or [I]Gods of Egypt[/I] that had a predominantly white cast, even for the Egyptian gods. Or [I]Exodus: Gods and Kings[/I]. [I]The Wall[/I] wasn't as bad, but came at the wrong time. There were a couple other examples that year, so it became "the third in the list". Really, [I]The Wall[/I] is more an example of the white saviour, where a white dude has to come in and save the day. But, when watching the movie, that movie was much more of an ensemble piece with white and Chinese heroes. And it doesn't work as well without the outsider, as you need them to serve as the audience proxy when explaining the backstory. Anyhoo, that's off topic. I agree that you should cast actors based on their ability. And, as you say, with obvious exceptions for historical figures. Or real people and not just historical figures, because someone shouldn't have to be "historical" to be played by someone of the same ethnicity. But there's the two other topics that smash into that. As OB1 says, there's [B]whitewashing[/B], where you give a part to a white actor rather than a minority or person of colour. Typically casting a white actor as a non-white historical figure. This wouldn't necessarily apply here for the drow anymore than it would apply for Klingons in Star Trek. The make-up erases the ethnicity and doesn't match to a real person. Kruge wasn't a real historical person so it's not an issue to have him played by a white actor. And since the Klingons were effectively stand-ins for Russians in the political narrative, it very much was not whitewashing... The bigger issue is [B]blackface[/B]. Casting white actors and painting their face black. Which ties into a whole lot of minstrel culture and mocking of African Americans in theatres for the entertainment of whites, and in a modern sense also invokes cultural appropriation. It's a messy thorny issue. Now, you can cast white people as dark-skinned non-people. Again, see the Klingons for an example for how it can work without upsetting people. Because it's a very different culture and not associated with any minstrel tropes. The third issue is casting black people as "the bad guy". This is the more problematic issue for the movie. Because fantasy tends to take place in a very whitewashed Eurocentric world. And thus the "good guys" tend to be Caucasian and the monstrous, savage villains tend to be dark skinned. Dark as evil is a pretty old concept that doesn't really match to racism. Black being evil can be found worldwide. Light/ dark dualism is big in Zoroastrianism, which is from the Middle East region. Japan has the ying-yang. So presenting the bad guy as dark skinned (like the orcs in [I]Lord of the Rings[/I]) isn't intentionally racist. Buuut... When when the 20% of North American audiences watch the film and don't see anyone that looks like them as a "good guy" and the only people remotely like them are "monstrous bad guys" that makes them uneasy. Even if they're a unnatural dark grey colour (like the orcs). It feeds into a problematic narrative. Like how the only Middle Eastern characters in action movies are terrorists. Again, you can have the bad guys as dark skinned without a problem, if there are also people of colour on the side of the angels. Going for the Star Trek hat trick, it doesn't matter if the Klingons are evil and dark skinned. Because the [I]Enterprise [/I]has a diverse multiracial crew. Black people watching the show wouldn't see the Klingons and bad guys as the only people that looked like them. The evil army works nicely because it allows an extended action sequence for the climax where the team of heroes all fight waves of mooks. A battle sequence with a group of people against one person requires a lot more coordination and choreographing. But a big monster would be easier. Really... the big bad of the movie [I]needs[/I] to be a dragon. The D&D movie absolutely needs a dungeon and dragon. And having a pitched epic battle against a dragon would be fun. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
(Yet another) D&D Movie Speculation thread.
Top