Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Yet another multiclassing fix...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fuindordm" data-source="post: 4312098" data-attributes="member: 5435"><p>First of all, let me just say that I don't think multiclassing is broken. At least, no so much that drastic measures are required! This post lays out three <em>concise </em> and minor changes to the rules that I feel are warranted.</p><p></p><p>Note: I'm placing this in the 'Rules' forum rather than the 'House Rules' forum for two reasons. First, the changes are really minor. Second, I'm interested in other people's thoughts on whether RAW multiclassing is balanced appropriately.</p><p></p><p>In the heroic tier, the only problem I see is that multiclass feats give you a fixed benefit. The player should have some freedom to choose what features of the second class they trained in. Otherwise, I think 3 feats is an appropriate sacrifice for increased versatility and the potential to set up unusual combos.</p><p></p><p>In the paragon tier, it's clear that multiclassing has been severely gimped. The power swaps are no problem, but you don't gain anything from them that you wouldn't have had already. Note that the power swap feats grow with you--at 10th level and beyond, you can have any three level-appropriate powers you want from the second class. The extra powers you gain from the paragon path just give you a broader range of options, not more powerful options. Furthermore, the character loses an action point bonus and a significant "flavor" power for no reason that I can see. After all, you already paid a heavy price for the versatility.</p><p></p><p>And frankly, I don't understand the underlying constraint of "thou shall not have more than 2 at-wills". They aren't powerful--it can't be <em>that </em>unbalancing to have one more. </p><p></p><p>So here's my proposal:</p><p></p><p><strong>Change the [XX Multiclass] feats to read:</strong></p><p>Prerequisite: unchanged</p><p>Benefits: </p><p>First, you gain training in one skill from the second class' list. If the second class has any required skills, you must choose one of these. If the second class can use implements, so can you. You count as that class for the purpose of taking feats and paragon paths.</p><p></p><p>Second, you choose <em>one </em>minor or partial class feature, with the following guidelines:</p><p> <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/1.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":1:" title="One :1:" data-shortname=":1:" /> Take an at-will attack power or class feature from the second class as an encounter power (examples: eldritch blast, magic missile, warlock's curse, shadow walk, tactical presence, tide of iron, sneak attack, hunter's quarry, warlock's curse).</p><p> <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/2.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":2:" title="Two :2:" data-shortname=":2:" /> Take a limited class feature from the second class as a daily power (examples: inspiring word, channel divinity)</p><p> <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/3.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":3:" title="Three :3:" data-shortname=":3:" /> Take a weaker version of a utility class feature (examples: 2 wizard cantrips, gain a warlock pact without the boon or at-will).</p><p> <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/4.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":4:" title="Four :4:" data-shortname=":4:" /> The DM may rule that certain features implying significant mastery of a technique are off-limits to a dabbler such as yourself (example: implement mastery, combat superiority) </p><p></p><p>Option: if you feel the revised multiclass feat is too powerful, remove the ability to use implements. The martial classes tend to have fewer interesting class features anyway. This feature can then be rolled into the new feat proposed below:</p><p></p><p><strong>New feat: Multiclass training</strong></p><p>Prerequisite: XX Multiclass</p><p>Benefit: you gain one weapon and one armor proficiency from class XX. The armor proficiency must follow the usual sequence; for example, a Wizard [Fighter] could gain leather or hide armor. [Alternatively, this feat gives you access to the implements of your second class.]</p><p></p><p><strong>Paragon Multiclassing</strong>:</p><p></p><p>At level 11, gain an at-will from the second class (this replaces the action point boost enjoyed by paragon paths).</p><p>At level 11, upgrade the partial class feature chosen for your multiclassing feat to a full class feature.</p><p>At level 11, take an encounter power from the second class as usual.</p><p> </p><p>If you feel this is too good, then you could make the player spend their level 11 feat to upgrade their class feature.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fuindordm, post: 4312098, member: 5435"] First of all, let me just say that I don't think multiclassing is broken. At least, no so much that drastic measures are required! This post lays out three [I]concise [/I] and minor changes to the rules that I feel are warranted. Note: I'm placing this in the 'Rules' forum rather than the 'House Rules' forum for two reasons. First, the changes are really minor. Second, I'm interested in other people's thoughts on whether RAW multiclassing is balanced appropriately. In the heroic tier, the only problem I see is that multiclass feats give you a fixed benefit. The player should have some freedom to choose what features of the second class they trained in. Otherwise, I think 3 feats is an appropriate sacrifice for increased versatility and the potential to set up unusual combos. In the paragon tier, it's clear that multiclassing has been severely gimped. The power swaps are no problem, but you don't gain anything from them that you wouldn't have had already. Note that the power swap feats grow with you--at 10th level and beyond, you can have any three level-appropriate powers you want from the second class. The extra powers you gain from the paragon path just give you a broader range of options, not more powerful options. Furthermore, the character loses an action point bonus and a significant "flavor" power for no reason that I can see. After all, you already paid a heavy price for the versatility. And frankly, I don't understand the underlying constraint of "thou shall not have more than 2 at-wills". They aren't powerful--it can't be [I]that [/I]unbalancing to have one more. So here's my proposal: [B]Change the [XX Multiclass] feats to read:[/B] Prerequisite: unchanged Benefits: First, you gain training in one skill from the second class' list. If the second class has any required skills, you must choose one of these. If the second class can use implements, so can you. You count as that class for the purpose of taking feats and paragon paths. Second, you choose [I]one [/I]minor or partial class feature, with the following guidelines: :1: Take an at-will attack power or class feature from the second class as an encounter power (examples: eldritch blast, magic missile, warlock's curse, shadow walk, tactical presence, tide of iron, sneak attack, hunter's quarry, warlock's curse). :2: Take a limited class feature from the second class as a daily power (examples: inspiring word, channel divinity) :3: Take a weaker version of a utility class feature (examples: 2 wizard cantrips, gain a warlock pact without the boon or at-will). :4: The DM may rule that certain features implying significant mastery of a technique are off-limits to a dabbler such as yourself (example: implement mastery, combat superiority) Option: if you feel the revised multiclass feat is too powerful, remove the ability to use implements. The martial classes tend to have fewer interesting class features anyway. This feature can then be rolled into the new feat proposed below: [B]New feat: Multiclass training[/B] Prerequisite: XX Multiclass Benefit: you gain one weapon and one armor proficiency from class XX. The armor proficiency must follow the usual sequence; for example, a Wizard [Fighter] could gain leather or hide armor. [Alternatively, this feat gives you access to the implements of your second class.] [B]Paragon Multiclassing[/B]: At level 11, gain an at-will from the second class (this replaces the action point boost enjoyed by paragon paths). At level 11, upgrade the partial class feature chosen for your multiclassing feat to a full class feature. At level 11, take an encounter power from the second class as usual. If you feel this is too good, then you could make the player spend their level 11 feat to upgrade their class feature. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Yet another multiclassing fix...
Top