Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Yet another Solos fix: "Solo actions"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rolenet" data-source="post: 7057754" data-attributes="member: 6874615"><p>My reaction to this is, frankly, astonishment at the effort you manage to put into this. The reason is very practical: I certainly understand the value in all your encounter design goals, and I certainly see why it's a great idea, and how attractive such an encounter is. <strong>But it seems a nightmare to actually deliver this, time and again.</strong></p><p></p><p><u>4e is great because designing encounters can be very quick</u> - very easy to balance; very fast to prepare monster stats, and even modify them. But add to this basic things like preparing the terrain, its features, basic relationship with the plot, tactics etc... in my experience, for a weekly game featuring 2-3 encounters, plus every thing "in between", <u>that's already quite enough work!</u></p><p></p><p>Now add novel mechanics, full plot integration, when all of this has to be balanced outside of the more usual combat mechanics, my head hurts! Even worse: alternatives - that means thinking about several outcomes, balance them, even though they may very well not arise.</p><p>So while I do this kind of things myself, that's pretty rare.</p><p></p><p>Of course, one may say that "<em>if you don't make your encounter interesting, you might as well not run it</em>!".</p><p>So my point is actually: <strong>the good thing about 4e is that straight fights are already interesting as is</strong> - notably more that pretty much all games I know. Hence, developing them much further seems certainly awesome... but not that crucial!</p><p>AND because 4e has a strong internal logic/balance, <em>it is more work to add these elements to a 4e fight than, say, a AD&D fight</em>. This is why I would normally tend to expect this kind of prep for other games. (you may recognize this argument from the Trash Mob Fight thread)</p><p></p><p>So to sum up: <span style="color: #008000">great idea, but I cannot see myself doing this every time, at least IF this has to be pre-planned, AND preserve the internal encounter balance</span>. (this is why I was asking you whether you improvised these things or not).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rolenet, post: 7057754, member: 6874615"] My reaction to this is, frankly, astonishment at the effort you manage to put into this. The reason is very practical: I certainly understand the value in all your encounter design goals, and I certainly see why it's a great idea, and how attractive such an encounter is. [B]But it seems a nightmare to actually deliver this, time and again.[/B] [U]4e is great because designing encounters can be very quick[/U] - very easy to balance; very fast to prepare monster stats, and even modify them. But add to this basic things like preparing the terrain, its features, basic relationship with the plot, tactics etc... in my experience, for a weekly game featuring 2-3 encounters, plus every thing "in between", [U]that's already quite enough work![/U] Now add novel mechanics, full plot integration, when all of this has to be balanced outside of the more usual combat mechanics, my head hurts! Even worse: alternatives - that means thinking about several outcomes, balance them, even though they may very well not arise. So while I do this kind of things myself, that's pretty rare. Of course, one may say that "[I]if you don't make your encounter interesting, you might as well not run it[/I]!". So my point is actually: [B]the good thing about 4e is that straight fights are already interesting as is[/B] - notably more that pretty much all games I know. Hence, developing them much further seems certainly awesome... but not that crucial! AND because 4e has a strong internal logic/balance, [I]it is more work to add these elements to a 4e fight than, say, a AD&D fight[/I]. This is why I would normally tend to expect this kind of prep for other games. (you may recognize this argument from the Trash Mob Fight thread) So to sum up: [COLOR="#008000"]great idea, but I cannot see myself doing this every time, at least IF this has to be pre-planned, AND preserve the internal encounter balance[/COLOR]. (this is why I was asking you whether you improvised these things or not). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Yet another Solos fix: "Solo actions"
Top