Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="MoogleEmpMog" data-source="post: 3854185" data-attributes="member: 22882">Could we PLEASE let this issue die?  It's not going to change.Anyway, 'warrior' doesn't differentiate itself from 'fighter.'  The only way it's differentiated from 'soldier' makes it actually LESS appropriate for the concept: warrior to me has the connotation of a combatant trained primarily to fight on his own, trusting to a personal code of honor and to his own abilities, whereas soldier has the connotation of a combatant trained to fight in a unit, trusting to discipline and leadership.In fact, I can't actually think of a proposed name that seems LESS appropriate for the warlord role.Again, I would have picked 'captain' if I were the one pulling the trigger on names at WotC, but warlord is better than most of the alternatives and leagues ahead of warrior.</blockquote>