I always did think the Asian variants, the yeti (Abominable Snowman)/almas (Russian Wildman)/yeh ren (Chinese Wildman) had much better cases for them than sasquatch, etc. The foot looks similar to an ape's, I think, with the big toe (or little toe?) off to the side a bit, like a gorilla's. Although the X-ray looks more human, the toe in that doesn't look to splay off at all. Also unusual to me is that all the toes appear to be the same size, whereas in humans, the big toe is larger.
The theory which I buy into is the one Bernard Heuvelmans had late in his life, which is that the almas/yeh ren/yeti are survivals of the mainland Asiatic orangutans (they used to live on the mainland way back in the day).
Minor gripes with the media:
The area's wrong. The Altai Mts. are mostly in Mongolia. The tail end of them overlaps into Russia, but it's Kazakhstan, not Siberia.
They always get the names wrong! In the Altais, it's almasty, not yeti. Yeti is strictly in Nepal. Grr! But really, only someone who's anally retentive like me would get worked up about that.
At least they didn't call it Bigfoot. God, I loathe that term.
If I
really wanted to be anal, the
Siberian wildman is the chuchunaa.
