Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
You are D&D's Bible Keeper - What do you do?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Set" data-source="post: 3424114" data-attributes="member: 41584"><p>I'd want another Unearthed Arcana type book, full of setting-free *options.*</p><p></p><p>I'd want to take the best ideas from Monte Cook's Arcana Unearthed, such as the magic system, and the best ideas from Iron Heroes, and strap them together to revitalize the magic using and melee combat classes.</p><p></p><p>Metamagic feats and the Tome of Battle stuff would die a tragic death. The arcane / divine caster split would likewise die. If I want to run a D&D game without religion, I shouldn't be limited to Bards for healing magic... If I want to run it with a horde of divinely-sponsored casters, or make *all* casters divinely sponsored, that too should be an *option,* not a hard-and-fast straightjacket.</p><p></p><p>Prestige Classes would die. Far too setting-specific. Any PrC class ability worth having would be part of a Feat chain, or an Alternate Class Feature for one of the base classes. Specialized core classes would similarly die, with the Barbarian, Ranger and Monk all being reduced to Feat Chains that a Fighter can take, to turn himself into a near-exact duplicate of the current Core Monk, Barbarian or Ranger, or mix-and-match to a limited extent, to be a light skirmishing Fighter with Rangery dual-wielding, a Barbarian's Rage and a Monk's unarmed AC and movement bonus, for instance. If my 'lawful' martial artist wants to be able to enter a focused state of combat zen / moving meditation that functions mechanically as a Barbarian's Rage, he should be able to buy the Feat chain to do so, without being artificially constrained by 'alignment' concerns or 'monks can't cross-class' concerns or any other setting-specific crap.</p><p></p><p>Magic would be set down as a list of 'effects,' with multiple systems for achieving those effects. One would be Vancian fire-and-forget. One would be a spontaneous casting mechanic. One would be a mix-and-match Ars Magica / Mage: the Ascension / True Sorcery / Freeform style. One would be spell points. Pick the flavor most applicable to your own style, or even have multiple mechanics in the same world (as D&D already does with Sorcerers and Wizards and Psions). Yeah, I included Psionics there too. As far as I'm concerned, it's just another form of 'magic,' in that it's a system arranged around doing 'other stuff.' Call it mental powers, call it arcane might, call it 'invoking divine favor,' call it mutant goat-cheese for all I care, it doesn't need *an entirely seperate set of rules* to do the same darn things. *One* list of effects, whether you cast spontaneously, prepared or freeform and whether or not you call your 'special fantasy power' magic, psionics, incarnum or the-art-of-flipping-out-and-killing-stuff. These rules would be completely setting independent. A 'spell' (power) that allows you to channel all of your 'magical' potential (psychic discipline, whatever) into melee combat wouldn't be called 'Tenser's Transformation,' it would be called something like 'Warrior Mind,' with a note at the bottom that spellcasters in the Greyhawk setting call it 'Tenser's Transformation' after a particularly militant spellcaster of that setting. Effects would all scale, like Fireball or Summon Monster, increasing with a) higher level spell slots, b) more spell points blown, c) greater strain on the caster, d) whatever. Similarly, a higher level caster could cast a 'diminished' version, to save power, or when he's scraping bottom of the spell point pool / slots per day.</p><p></p><p>I'd 'normalize' the monsters vs the PC races. No more bizarrely assigned stats, leading to a stableboy getting killed by a Ghoul and rising with a higher Charisma score than the King. The *biggest* problem with the notion of Savage Species was the ridiculous and inconsistent levels of various attributes and abilities possessed by many of the beasties in the SRD. Monsters with 'casts spells as an X level whatever' would lose those features and simply be listed as 'blah-blah Eladrin are *always* at least 7th level Clerics, with two of the following Domains.' I hate one set of rules for PCs and another for NPCs. *One* set of rules. Then, when someone *inevitably* wants to play an Aranea or something, there doesn't have to be a lot of hands-waving and running about trying to kludge a fit between things that *weren't properly designed according to the same rules.*</p><p></p><p>The Spiked Chain would die. I will happily suspend disbelief to include multi-tonned 'cold-breathing' arctic flying reptilians, but that piece of crap spits on the laws of physics and jumps up and down on the grave of common sense, and doesn't even have the excuse of being magical to hide behind.</p><p></p><p>Vermin would gain Intelligence scores. Bees are as trainable as rats. Bees the size of ponies that can be trained to serve as flying mounts? Yeah, definite Intelligence score and *not* immune to mind-affecting effects. Try again. Same for any other thing with an Intelligence score. If that Treant can talk to me, if that Ooze can cast spells, then they've got minds to 'affect.' Stop with the random granting of immunities (or sense types) that make no sense (such as those sightless underdark critters who happen to get free Darkvision as part of their 'type').</p><p></p><p>The Swarm rules suck. I have no brilliant idea how to fix them, only that their current implementation mocks my delicate sensibilities.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Set, post: 3424114, member: 41584"] I'd want another Unearthed Arcana type book, full of setting-free *options.* I'd want to take the best ideas from Monte Cook's Arcana Unearthed, such as the magic system, and the best ideas from Iron Heroes, and strap them together to revitalize the magic using and melee combat classes. Metamagic feats and the Tome of Battle stuff would die a tragic death. The arcane / divine caster split would likewise die. If I want to run a D&D game without religion, I shouldn't be limited to Bards for healing magic... If I want to run it with a horde of divinely-sponsored casters, or make *all* casters divinely sponsored, that too should be an *option,* not a hard-and-fast straightjacket. Prestige Classes would die. Far too setting-specific. Any PrC class ability worth having would be part of a Feat chain, or an Alternate Class Feature for one of the base classes. Specialized core classes would similarly die, with the Barbarian, Ranger and Monk all being reduced to Feat Chains that a Fighter can take, to turn himself into a near-exact duplicate of the current Core Monk, Barbarian or Ranger, or mix-and-match to a limited extent, to be a light skirmishing Fighter with Rangery dual-wielding, a Barbarian's Rage and a Monk's unarmed AC and movement bonus, for instance. If my 'lawful' martial artist wants to be able to enter a focused state of combat zen / moving meditation that functions mechanically as a Barbarian's Rage, he should be able to buy the Feat chain to do so, without being artificially constrained by 'alignment' concerns or 'monks can't cross-class' concerns or any other setting-specific crap. Magic would be set down as a list of 'effects,' with multiple systems for achieving those effects. One would be Vancian fire-and-forget. One would be a spontaneous casting mechanic. One would be a mix-and-match Ars Magica / Mage: the Ascension / True Sorcery / Freeform style. One would be spell points. Pick the flavor most applicable to your own style, or even have multiple mechanics in the same world (as D&D already does with Sorcerers and Wizards and Psions). Yeah, I included Psionics there too. As far as I'm concerned, it's just another form of 'magic,' in that it's a system arranged around doing 'other stuff.' Call it mental powers, call it arcane might, call it 'invoking divine favor,' call it mutant goat-cheese for all I care, it doesn't need *an entirely seperate set of rules* to do the same darn things. *One* list of effects, whether you cast spontaneously, prepared or freeform and whether or not you call your 'special fantasy power' magic, psionics, incarnum or the-art-of-flipping-out-and-killing-stuff. These rules would be completely setting independent. A 'spell' (power) that allows you to channel all of your 'magical' potential (psychic discipline, whatever) into melee combat wouldn't be called 'Tenser's Transformation,' it would be called something like 'Warrior Mind,' with a note at the bottom that spellcasters in the Greyhawk setting call it 'Tenser's Transformation' after a particularly militant spellcaster of that setting. Effects would all scale, like Fireball or Summon Monster, increasing with a) higher level spell slots, b) more spell points blown, c) greater strain on the caster, d) whatever. Similarly, a higher level caster could cast a 'diminished' version, to save power, or when he's scraping bottom of the spell point pool / slots per day. I'd 'normalize' the monsters vs the PC races. No more bizarrely assigned stats, leading to a stableboy getting killed by a Ghoul and rising with a higher Charisma score than the King. The *biggest* problem with the notion of Savage Species was the ridiculous and inconsistent levels of various attributes and abilities possessed by many of the beasties in the SRD. Monsters with 'casts spells as an X level whatever' would lose those features and simply be listed as 'blah-blah Eladrin are *always* at least 7th level Clerics, with two of the following Domains.' I hate one set of rules for PCs and another for NPCs. *One* set of rules. Then, when someone *inevitably* wants to play an Aranea or something, there doesn't have to be a lot of hands-waving and running about trying to kludge a fit between things that *weren't properly designed according to the same rules.* The Spiked Chain would die. I will happily suspend disbelief to include multi-tonned 'cold-breathing' arctic flying reptilians, but that piece of crap spits on the laws of physics and jumps up and down on the grave of common sense, and doesn't even have the excuse of being magical to hide behind. Vermin would gain Intelligence scores. Bees are as trainable as rats. Bees the size of ponies that can be trained to serve as flying mounts? Yeah, definite Intelligence score and *not* immune to mind-affecting effects. Try again. Same for any other thing with an Intelligence score. If that Treant can talk to me, if that Ooze can cast spells, then they've got minds to 'affect.' Stop with the random granting of immunities (or sense types) that make no sense (such as those sightless underdark critters who happen to get free Darkvision as part of their 'type'). The Swarm rules suck. I have no brilliant idea how to fix them, only that their current implementation mocks my delicate sensibilities. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
You are D&D's Bible Keeper - What do you do?
Top