Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
You Bastard! "A New Begining?!"[Players and Intrest Wanted!] [Feedback Requested!]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Phoenix8008" data-source="post: 3454597" data-attributes="member: 211"><p>Well, that would introduce some interesting changes. You could build an entirely defensive fighter that wins by wearing down his opponent by denying that foe as many flags gained during the fight! But imagine taking it a step further, could you possibly learn a style both offensively AND defensively??!! So when you used such a style if you win you get an extra flag but if you lose you lose one less flag. This begs the question in my mind of whether or not you could learn the same style twice either offensively or defensively. (Maybe only after a certain tier?)</p><p></p><p></p><p>I would argue that it's more realistic to keep it open to any move you used during the fight, not just ones used succesfully (especially if we open up defensive sig styles as above. If you won the round but gained no flags due to your opponents defensive sig style, then was the move used succesfully?) Using only moves that they already used well just doesn't seem right to me. Some people strive to do better when they didn't do well before. Sometimes you work harder to get something right after you've failed at it. So I think even if you didn't win the round with a move doesn't mean it couldn't be something a character would be interested in studying.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Naming the tiers like that at all makes it hard to open up higher tiers later if we want to extend things out further. After all, what is higher than a Grandmaster? I would argue that they could just stay numbered and the players will make up their own titles for each character (not necessarily each tier) as they wish. Unless you do a mortals and immortals thing of some sort. Maybe at the point when there are a minimum number of grandmasters (3?? 5?? I don't know, but something fairly low with a minimum of 2) then they transcend the mortal realm and start the tiers again as unskilled immortals. At this point they can only battle other immortals. Could there be other levels beyond the Immortals? Ancients, Old Ones? Who knows. Do they keep their gained styles or lose them and start over? I don't know. I'm making this up as I type it!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Phoenix8008, post: 3454597, member: 211"] Well, that would introduce some interesting changes. You could build an entirely defensive fighter that wins by wearing down his opponent by denying that foe as many flags gained during the fight! But imagine taking it a step further, could you possibly learn a style both offensively AND defensively??!! So when you used such a style if you win you get an extra flag but if you lose you lose one less flag. This begs the question in my mind of whether or not you could learn the same style twice either offensively or defensively. (Maybe only after a certain tier?) I would argue that it's more realistic to keep it open to any move you used during the fight, not just ones used succesfully (especially if we open up defensive sig styles as above. If you won the round but gained no flags due to your opponents defensive sig style, then was the move used succesfully?) Using only moves that they already used well just doesn't seem right to me. Some people strive to do better when they didn't do well before. Sometimes you work harder to get something right after you've failed at it. So I think even if you didn't win the round with a move doesn't mean it couldn't be something a character would be interested in studying. Naming the tiers like that at all makes it hard to open up higher tiers later if we want to extend things out further. After all, what is higher than a Grandmaster? I would argue that they could just stay numbered and the players will make up their own titles for each character (not necessarily each tier) as they wish. Unless you do a mortals and immortals thing of some sort. Maybe at the point when there are a minimum number of grandmasters (3?? 5?? I don't know, but something fairly low with a minimum of 2) then they transcend the mortal realm and start the tiers again as unskilled immortals. At this point they can only battle other immortals. Could there be other levels beyond the Immortals? Ancients, Old Ones? Who knows. Do they keep their gained styles or lose them and start over? I don't know. I'm making this up as I type it!! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
You Bastard! "A New Begining?!"[Players and Intrest Wanted!] [Feedback Requested!]
Top