Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
You can't necessarily go back
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="triqui" data-source="post: 6006107" data-attributes="member: 57948"><p>The game has more balanced ability scores. Now, every ability score is worthy to have to some class, because all of them work to attack. There's nothing in the new edition that make having dumpstats more interesting from a optimization point of view than it was in 3e. Nothing. The difference is now, as a Wizard, I can opt to dump Wisdom instead of Charisma, if I want so, because Charisma works for Will defense too. That does not make "dump stats" more interesting, or better. It just made all abilities equally important and equally easy to dump (ie: balanced)</p><p></p><p>And classes got secondary stats for riders, which make people having something extra to think about when buying their stats. A fighter, for example, benefit not only from STR and CON, as in 3rd edition, but also from Dexterity (if he is going to use swords, flails or spears), or Wisdom (for OA).</p><p></p><p> This makes me scratch my head. If the monsters are more balanced over the course of an average encounter, and the monsters do not survive an encounter, per definition, how are they less balanced overall?</p><p></p><p>I think you might want to try other word there. Maybe they aren't <em>organical</em>. Or even <em>fun</em>. But if they are more balanced in a encounter, then they are more balanced overall. Because overall, the point of monsters is to provide an encounter.</p><p></p><p>They also work to fill the world with plots, and to make immersion possible. And maybe 4e monsters do not work (for you) in those matters. But if they are balanced, they are balanced.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It is not. That doesn't mean the game isn't balanced, though. Mutual Assured Destruction in the Cold War was munchkinism, yet it was balanced. </p><p>The point of 4e balance is not that you have made impossible to build strong characters. The point of 4e balance is that you can make a strong build character *with any class*. Which is vastly different to 3e, where you only had the option to build strong build character with tier 1 spellcasters. Everyone else just played in a minor league. Sure, they could be better than average in that minor league. But the best Center in Woman NBA is no match to Dwight Howard, and at the end of the day, an optimized 3e fighter was, still, a woman playing in the men's NBA of God Wizards and CODzillas, from an optimizing point of view.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="triqui, post: 6006107, member: 57948"] The game has more balanced ability scores. Now, every ability score is worthy to have to some class, because all of them work to attack. There's nothing in the new edition that make having dumpstats more interesting from a optimization point of view than it was in 3e. Nothing. The difference is now, as a Wizard, I can opt to dump Wisdom instead of Charisma, if I want so, because Charisma works for Will defense too. That does not make "dump stats" more interesting, or better. It just made all abilities equally important and equally easy to dump (ie: balanced) And classes got secondary stats for riders, which make people having something extra to think about when buying their stats. A fighter, for example, benefit not only from STR and CON, as in 3rd edition, but also from Dexterity (if he is going to use swords, flails or spears), or Wisdom (for OA). This makes me scratch my head. If the monsters are more balanced over the course of an average encounter, and the monsters do not survive an encounter, per definition, how are they less balanced overall? I think you might want to try other word there. Maybe they aren't [i]organical[/i]. Or even [i]fun[/i]. But if they are more balanced in a encounter, then they are more balanced overall. Because overall, the point of monsters is to provide an encounter. They also work to fill the world with plots, and to make immersion possible. And maybe 4e monsters do not work (for you) in those matters. But if they are balanced, they are balanced. It is not. That doesn't mean the game isn't balanced, though. Mutual Assured Destruction in the Cold War was munchkinism, yet it was balanced. The point of 4e balance is not that you have made impossible to build strong characters. The point of 4e balance is that you can make a strong build character *with any class*. Which is vastly different to 3e, where you only had the option to build strong build character with tier 1 spellcasters. Everyone else just played in a minor league. Sure, they could be better than average in that minor league. But the best Center in Woman NBA is no match to Dwight Howard, and at the end of the day, an optimized 3e fighter was, still, a woman playing in the men's NBA of God Wizards and CODzillas, from an optimizing point of view. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
You can't necessarily go back
Top