Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Viking Bastard" data-source="post: 5483965" data-attributes="member: 509">I update my previous statement on IE6 to about 5%, I read it wrong.<a href="http://gs.statcounter.com/" target="_blank">StatCounter Global Stats - Browser, OS, Search Engine including Mobile Market Share</a> is where I took those numbers, but most googlable sources seem to give similar stats. Microsoft has become really aggressive in the last couple of years to get people to update (IE6/7 makes them look really bad).I looked at North American stats, since we don't really have to consider places like China.But, y'know, fair enough. I'm sure WotC did extensive analysis on the whole thing and saw that Silverlight was cheapest and quickest. I still think they should've thought a bit farther ahead and HTML/JS is the better bet for the long term.If they're moving D&amp;D online, do it properly. Web users have gotten a lot more picky.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Viking Bastard, post: 5483965, member: 509"] I update my previous statement on IE6 to about 5%, I read it wrong. [url=http://gs.statcounter.com/]StatCounter Global Stats - Browser, OS, Search Engine including Mobile Market Share[/url] is where I took those numbers, but most googlable sources seem to give similar stats. Microsoft has become really aggressive in the last couple of years to get people to update (IE6/7 makes them look really bad). I looked at North American stats, since we don't really have to consider places like China. But, y'know, fair enough. I'm sure WotC did extensive analysis on the whole thing and saw that Silverlight was cheapest and quickest. I still think they should've thought a bit farther ahead and HTML/JS is the better bet for the long term. If they're moving D&D online, do it properly. Web users have gotten a lot more picky. [/QUOTE]

Verification