Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
You primary stat should never be lower than 18
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kennew142" data-source="post: 4312760" data-attributes="member: 18490"><p>On the other hand, you could try role-playing and build the character that best fits your concept - instead of trying to squeeze every point of combat advantage out of the character. I can't imagine ever choosing a character race based on what bonuses it gave me to what stat.</p><p></p><p>I've only had a chance to play two of the five 4e characters I've built. Neither has an 18 in anything, and neither of them has been even remotely ineffective in combat.</p><p></p><p>I'm not saying there is anything wrong with character optimization, if that's how you like to play. But it's a little arrogant to assume that everyone else must play the same way. For 30+ years, lots of players have been making characters based on character concept and background instead of power/optimization. </p><p></p><p>Beginning the game with a +3 bonus to hit from stats doesn't make a character too weak or ineffective. It's only one point less than having an 18 in your primary stat - that is, +1 to hit and +1 to damage. Like everything else in character creation, it's a choice.</p><p></p><p>I will say that the OP is wrong. No one <strong>has</strong> to have an 18 in their primary stat.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kennew142, post: 4312760, member: 18490"] On the other hand, you could try role-playing and build the character that best fits your concept - instead of trying to squeeze every point of combat advantage out of the character. I can't imagine ever choosing a character race based on what bonuses it gave me to what stat. I've only had a chance to play two of the five 4e characters I've built. Neither has an 18 in anything, and neither of them has been even remotely ineffective in combat. I'm not saying there is anything wrong with character optimization, if that's how you like to play. But it's a little arrogant to assume that everyone else must play the same way. For 30+ years, lots of players have been making characters based on character concept and background instead of power/optimization. Beginning the game with a +3 bonus to hit from stats doesn't make a character too weak or ineffective. It's only one point less than having an 18 in your primary stat - that is, +1 to hit and +1 to damage. Like everything else in character creation, it's a choice. I will say that the OP is wrong. No one [B]has[/B] to have an 18 in their primary stat. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
You primary stat should never be lower than 18
Top