Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 8831802" data-attributes="member: 15700">While there isn't a consensus on how each table played, there is pretty much a consensus from us older folks that what is claimed in that video is flat out wrong, especially when trying to ascribe it to how everyone played back then.For 1e, sure is! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":P" title="Stick out tongue    :P"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":P" />  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />  Seriously, the books are all over the place.  It's doubly wrong to use one rule out of the book to override all the other stuff.  I.e., saying that early DMs didn't build worlds but only dungeons while ignoring the robust section in the DMG that explains how to build worlds...</blockquote>