Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Elf Witch" data-source="post: 4091884" data-attributes="member: 9037">I have a question why is it wrong to have questions and concerns about 4E based on the fact that we don't have all the answers but it is okay ot be totally thrilled with the new rule set when we don't have all the answers?I have had people say how can you make a decsion not to switch if you have not read the PHB and I have to wonder how can you say you will be switching if you have not read the PHB. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused    :confused:"  data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /> Voicing ones concerns about how a rule works ia not childish. The way you sound why are we even bothering discussing anything about 4E because we don't have the entire rule set in front of us.To the OP after reading a lot of the reviews and looking at what we do know I have had some of the same concerns as you on this subject.I was wondering how the rules was going to handle this. I suppose you can do non lethal damage but that requires beating on someone until they drop and as you pointed out and that is not always the way you want go. If it turns out that only some classes can disarm you could house rule it that anyone can try  it is just harder for them because they are not trained in disarming.</blockquote>