Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Your choices are Kill, or ... Kill
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lonely Tylenol" data-source="post: 4100931" data-attributes="member: 18549"><p>This formulation is nonsense, and doesn't represent anyone's position. How about this instead: In order to pass judgement on a game system, you must be able to answer objections that are raised over hypothetical situations that would require a reference to the rules. In as much as you are capable of answering those questions using an incomplete set of rules, you have the ability to judge the game system. In as much as you have lacunae in the sorts of questions you can answer with the rules you have access to, you are unable to judge the game system. You do not know what rules you don't have access to. Therefore, in order to be in a position to judge the system as a whole, you have to read the rules; in order to judge some small aspect of the system, you need to have access to the rules that interact with that aspect.</p><p></p><p>That sounds a hell of a lot more like what people are saying. I don't see why everyone has apparently allowed you to define their positions in the way that you have, and then argue on your terms about what they're trying to say.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lonely Tylenol, post: 4100931, member: 18549"] This formulation is nonsense, and doesn't represent anyone's position. How about this instead: In order to pass judgement on a game system, you must be able to answer objections that are raised over hypothetical situations that would require a reference to the rules. In as much as you are capable of answering those questions using an incomplete set of rules, you have the ability to judge the game system. In as much as you have lacunae in the sorts of questions you can answer with the rules you have access to, you are unable to judge the game system. You do not know what rules you don't have access to. Therefore, in order to be in a position to judge the system as a whole, you have to read the rules; in order to judge some small aspect of the system, you need to have access to the rules that interact with that aspect. That sounds a hell of a lot more like what people are saying. I don't see why everyone has apparently allowed you to define their positions in the way that you have, and then argue on your terms about what they're trying to say. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Your choices are Kill, or ... Kill
Top