Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 9824078" data-attributes="member: 6704184">Interesting. I like it. Im thinking about adding the warden alongside the barbarian to my list, or folding barbarian into warden, as the "tank that sues an altered mode" class.  I also dont have many purely mundane classes currently, mostly the Jack and...kinda the Swordmage (variant monk) and Ranger if you build them that way.But otherwise i think we have similar ideas of how the aechtypes of the game can be represented, at least on a broad overview. Interesting. I wonder how my own trpg Crossroads would hit your eyes...Very cool. I have thought alot about makimg spellcraft very lexiconographic in usage. Different languages have different linguistic elements with examples, and like subject, verb, object, and "form", make a spell, with more complex spells needing more complex constuctions like adverbs and such and complex forms. Forms would be basically stuff like "free prose", couplet, lymric, and on the exrteme end might include a sestina or villanelle. I wonder what the structure of liturgical spellwork should be...</blockquote>