Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Treebore" data-source="post: 4602271" data-attributes="member: 10177">With the caveat, all rules are subject to change, I write out my house rules and give them to my players. They are to tell me if they like it/them, and if not are to write up alternatives. I then consider their input and make any changes I like, and give a written explanation as to why I did or did not change things even more.Then they get implemented. If problems come up in play the rule gets tweaked and the changes noted in my write up ASAP.So things are done my way, but I have good players who have a good eye towards "balance", so I am fortunate enough to have good feedback too. So it works for me.The key is they have to write out their suggestions/problems. If they can't be bothered to write it up, like I do, then they don't really have any problems. So therefore don't have the right to argue with me about it. So aren't allowed to waste my time with verbal arguing/debate.So my thinking is, if it bugs them enough to put in the effort to write up suggestions, it really bugs them. IF they only want to verbally complain then they don't really care, they just want to complain.</blockquote>