Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="aco175" data-source="post: 7372150" data-attributes="member: 27385">I like the idea of having base classes and adding more powers as levels are gained.&nbsp; I also like combining the base classes to make more advanced classes.&nbsp; Not necessarily more powerful than if you kept the base class though.&nbsp; You could have a fighter base class and lead to more of a prestige class specializing in something, like a knight or defender/bodyguard type.&nbsp; You could also take a few levels in base cleric to become a paladin.&nbsp; I always liked 3e multiclassing and would like to see something as good as it was.&nbsp; The 4 base classes can advance in similar power and have option for powers on par with multiclassing.&nbsp; I think it can be easy to learn for new players and passing players not interested in options and good for others who want to specialize.&nbsp; The problem is not making the options better than staying base classed.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="aco175, post: 7372150, member: 27385"] I like the idea of having base classes and adding more powers as levels are gained. I also like combining the base classes to make more advanced classes. Not necessarily more powerful than if you kept the base class though. You could have a fighter base class and lead to more of a prestige class specializing in something, like a knight or defender/bodyguard type. You could also take a few levels in base cleric to become a paladin. I always liked 3e multiclassing and would like to see something as good as it was. The 4 base classes can advance in similar power and have option for powers on par with multiclassing. I think it can be easy to learn for new players and passing players not interested in options and good for others who want to specialize. The problem is not making the options better than staying base classed. [/QUOTE]

Verification