Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lord Captian Tobacco" data-source="post: 5310068" data-attributes="member: 93707">No Second Amendment right for spell castersOne odd point I never hear enough of is how the non-magic wielding population is supposed to deal with it. We all know that the mage is the best choice to be the brewer because of the game mechanics but what about the more psychological and emotional issues.  Consider the druid who gives up on adventuring to have the BEST grape growing fields in the kingdom.Or the ease in which a fallow field can be cleared with a ‘burning hands’ spell. But what of the mundane? Even if magic is not seen as heathen based or demonic it can defiantly be a source of concern for any community.  Today, we insist that no one has the right to possess a fully automatic weapon in their home, much less a grenade launcher or mortar. Why should a wizard, not bound to the king or constabulary force, be allowed to retain his spell book? Imagine the mayhem which can result when the wiz uses Magic Missile on that dog that dumps on his lawn. What about the use of a Charm Person spell on that good looking ward of the local Baron? The Baron, himself? Or the judge? Or the use of Div spells to cheat at cards? Don’t get me started on the ones with a necromantic bent. Maybe public peace laws require books be bound and sealed with wax the way a sword is required to be ‘tied’ in a town. Maybe the wands are ‘secured’ with the bailiff.  How would you feel living next to a crazy old coot who could level your barn if you annoy him?</blockquote>

Verification