Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Your most pointless TV/movie/book nitpicks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9859139" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>I just started watching Steal and I literally immediately assumed as soon as I saw more than one of them, that they'd done that for the sake of making themselves hard to conclusively ID by people and facial recognition. [ISPOILER]It didn't so much scream "acromegaly" to me as "Cro-Magnon man" (or Buffy vampire), those incredibly wide upper nose bridges and heavy brow ridges especially. Also you can tell they're prosthetics because they're so obviously unnatural (like the weird blue contacts one of the black guys is wearing - almost no human has eyes that colour, regardless of ethnicity) and kind of falling off a couple of times - I assume that was intentional, not just a blooper - (and the same black guy with the contacts has a goatee so fake it's completely obvious, but it still obscures his appearance). But unnatural isn't a big problem because they're there to make them harder to ID. I haven't got far but at least two of them had skin tones that looked fake too, possibly just caused by all the cover-up for the prosthetics.[/ISPOILER]</p><p></p><p>You were certainly right to recommend it as getting a lot of little details right. [ISPOILER]I did think none of them being bothered by the prosthetics/contacts and rubbing at them or the like was a little implausible but perhaps that will be justified by practice or something.[/ISPOILER]</p><p></p><p>The first actually questionable thing is a guy saying they might be made to sign NDAs about the event. < Extremely loud incorrect buzzer > I could go into detail, but no, you can't <em>make</em> people sign NDAs after the fact in the UK (worst case, they say no, you fire them, they probably have a decent case for unfair dismissal, and they can speak freely about the whole thing to whoever they choose), and if you try to, they're unlikely to be legally effective (there needs to be actual offer, consideration and acceptance - many NDAs lack this and are thus legally weak or ineffective in the UK), and they can also never, ever prevent you talking to the police, regulatory boards, solicitors, etc. about criminal activity.</p><p></p><p>Of course that same guy kind of seems like an idiot, so maybe he's just an idiot, I guess we'll see!</p><p></p><p>(The "this is the room with the good biscuits for guests, we nick them from time to time" and "I always wondered what the other floors looked" stuff rings appallingly true btw as someone who works in precisely that kind of building/environment lol. Also liked the micro-details like Sophie Turner's characters shirt is un-ironed and wrinkly, very real)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 9859139, member: 18"] I just started watching Steal and I literally immediately assumed as soon as I saw more than one of them, that they'd done that for the sake of making themselves hard to conclusively ID by people and facial recognition. [ISPOILER]It didn't so much scream "acromegaly" to me as "Cro-Magnon man" (or Buffy vampire), those incredibly wide upper nose bridges and heavy brow ridges especially. Also you can tell they're prosthetics because they're so obviously unnatural (like the weird blue contacts one of the black guys is wearing - almost no human has eyes that colour, regardless of ethnicity) and kind of falling off a couple of times - I assume that was intentional, not just a blooper - (and the same black guy with the contacts has a goatee so fake it's completely obvious, but it still obscures his appearance). But unnatural isn't a big problem because they're there to make them harder to ID. I haven't got far but at least two of them had skin tones that looked fake too, possibly just caused by all the cover-up for the prosthetics.[/ISPOILER] You were certainly right to recommend it as getting a lot of little details right. [ISPOILER]I did think none of them being bothered by the prosthetics/contacts and rubbing at them or the like was a little implausible but perhaps that will be justified by practice or something.[/ISPOILER] The first actually questionable thing is a guy saying they might be made to sign NDAs about the event. < Extremely loud incorrect buzzer > I could go into detail, but no, you can't [I]make[/I] people sign NDAs after the fact in the UK (worst case, they say no, you fire them, they probably have a decent case for unfair dismissal, and they can speak freely about the whole thing to whoever they choose), and if you try to, they're unlikely to be legally effective (there needs to be actual offer, consideration and acceptance - many NDAs lack this and are thus legally weak or ineffective in the UK), and they can also never, ever prevent you talking to the police, regulatory boards, solicitors, etc. about criminal activity. Of course that same guy kind of seems like an idiot, so maybe he's just an idiot, I guess we'll see! (The "this is the room with the good biscuits for guests, we nick them from time to time" and "I always wondered what the other floors looked" stuff rings appallingly true btw as someone who works in precisely that kind of building/environment lol. Also liked the micro-details like Sophie Turner's characters shirt is un-ironed and wrinkly, very real) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Your most pointless TV/movie/book nitpicks
Top