Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Keith Robinson" data-source="post: 3600027" data-attributes="member: 21330">I'm a bit of a sucker for adventures, so the recent glut of releases from WotC has kept me busy.&nbsp; I buy the generic and FR adventures, but not the Eberron ones.&nbsp; So I was wondering what other people here thought of the general quality of the adventures being released for 3.5?&nbsp; And by quality, I don't mean editing, etc, I mean the plot, the NPCs, the ideas.&nbsp; How do they stand up against adventures from previous editions in your opinion?I'm presently running the Red Hand of Doom and I think it is an excellent adventure.&nbsp; The players are being challenged and are required to be resourceful and the plot is epic and memorable.&nbsp; I think it stands up well against the adventures of any previous edition.&nbsp; But I haven't had a chance to check the others out yet... so what are your opinions?&nbsp; How many do you think will be remembered as classics in years to come?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Keith Robinson, post: 3600027, member: 21330"] I'm a bit of a sucker for adventures, so the recent glut of releases from WotC has kept me busy. I buy the generic and FR adventures, but not the Eberron ones. So I was wondering what other people here thought of the general quality of the adventures being released for 3.5? And by quality, I don't mean editing, etc, I mean the plot, the NPCs, the ideas. How do they stand up against adventures from previous editions in your opinion? I'm presently running the Red Hand of Doom and I think it is an excellent adventure. The players are being challenged and are required to be resourceful and the plot is epic and memorable. I think it stands up well against the adventures of any previous edition. But I haven't had a chance to check the others out yet... so what are your opinions? How many do you think will be remembered as classics in years to come? [/QUOTE]

Verification