Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Your thoughts on "Social Combat" systems
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Don Durito" data-source="post: 8159942" data-attributes="member: 6687260"><p>One thing that playing A Song of Ice and Fire helped me realise is that the purpose of social combat is basically to turn a socal encounter into a kind of set piece. </p><p></p><p>It's anti-climactic to try and convince the king that the threat of the Orcish invasion is real and then have it come down to one roll.</p><p></p><p>These days with D&D I tend to do it something like this: I write down a list of reasons why the king doesn't believe the Orcish Horde is real or doesn't want to act and give them a number rating. I also add in some facts about the king that can be leveraged.</p><p></p><p>eg</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Trusts his advisor 2 (who is a traitor assuring him the Orcish horde is not real.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Cowardly 2 (Is afraid to lead his armies into the field)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Concern for his kingdom 3</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Worried about his legacy 2</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Afraid of invasion by the neighbouring kingdom (worried that if he moves his armies north to fight the Orcs his neighbour will take the opportunity). 2</li> </ul><p></p><p>The PCs need to speak to the king and they need to hit at least 5 points. There's three points in concern for his kingdom but they can only get those points if they present three different arguments. Persuasion is not really necessary to make a lot of these points - they just have to make them. Persuasion is more for when they want to go against one of those points (convince him he can't trust his advisor) or when they contradict each other (allay his cowardice by appealling to how future generations will remember him) or try an approach not listed above but which is reasonably plausible. This means everyone can participate but characters with social skills just have a few more options.</p><p></p><p>I find this works quite well for common D&D situations where the players are trying to get something from an NPC. It provides just enough structure to communicate to the PCs. "He's wavering, but still doesn't look fully convinced".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Don Durito, post: 8159942, member: 6687260"] One thing that playing A Song of Ice and Fire helped me realise is that the purpose of social combat is basically to turn a socal encounter into a kind of set piece. It's anti-climactic to try and convince the king that the threat of the Orcish invasion is real and then have it come down to one roll. These days with D&D I tend to do it something like this: I write down a list of reasons why the king doesn't believe the Orcish Horde is real or doesn't want to act and give them a number rating. I also add in some facts about the king that can be leveraged. eg [LIST] [*]Trusts his advisor 2 (who is a traitor assuring him the Orcish horde is not real. [*]Cowardly 2 (Is afraid to lead his armies into the field) [*]Concern for his kingdom 3 [*]Worried about his legacy 2 [*]Afraid of invasion by the neighbouring kingdom (worried that if he moves his armies north to fight the Orcs his neighbour will take the opportunity). 2 [/LIST] The PCs need to speak to the king and they need to hit at least 5 points. There's three points in concern for his kingdom but they can only get those points if they present three different arguments. Persuasion is not really necessary to make a lot of these points - they just have to make them. Persuasion is more for when they want to go against one of those points (convince him he can't trust his advisor) or when they contradict each other (allay his cowardice by appealling to how future generations will remember him) or try an approach not listed above but which is reasonably plausible. This means everyone can participate but characters with social skills just have a few more options. I find this works quite well for common D&D situations where the players are trying to get something from an NPC. It provides just enough structure to communicate to the PCs. "He's wavering, but still doesn't look fully convinced". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Your thoughts on "Social Combat" systems
Top