Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Your thoughts on "Social Combat" systems
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 8161134" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>Want to start off responding to the OP before I read too much of the thread. </p><p></p><p>I don't know a lot of these systems, but there was one event in particular that made me really appreciate them in theory. </p><p></p><p>I was running a demo game for a friend's system at a convention. Part of the one-shot was that the players had been trying to solve the mystery of who had been using forbidden magic. They solved the mystery, they knew they had the right guy, but they had no evidence. What they needed was a confession. </p><p></p><p>However, when they went and confronted him, they rolled poorly. </p><p></p><p>In a system like what I was used to, that would have been the end of it. I can't let them just keep trying, they rolled, they failed. However, instead this system allowed us to activate a "mental combat". It worked fairly simply. The players kept trying different tactics, intimidating, persuading, deceiving, and the person had a "defense" roll to rebuff their arguments. </p><p></p><p>In a lot of ways, it was exactly like they just kept trying, but there was a key difference. As the "mental health" ran out, they would get forced by the system to drop the argument. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Basically, by making this a "combat" like encounter with a boss, it gave them the chance to not simply lose, but since it was a "combat" if they did lose, they knew that they couldn't just keep retrying. They would be out of "health" and defeated. </p><p></p><p>In the end, they succeeded. They flustered him into confessing before the authorities, and succeeded, and everyone felt AWESOME about it. </p><p></p><p>I do think it is unneccesary for 90% of social encounters. But in those moments where you have the party against a stubborn social challenge, I think it is very useful to put a thin layer of mechanics on it, just to track progress. Just so that it isn't "Well jon rolled a 23, so we succeeded and no one else needs to roll" or "Jerry rolled a 5, guess we fail guys" instead it is "well, I got a 13, that chipped away at his defense, but he's still being slippery, maybe now is when we bring up that journal we found, shake him up." </p><p></p><p></p><p>(I will now start reading the rest of the thread)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 8161134, member: 6801228"] Want to start off responding to the OP before I read too much of the thread. I don't know a lot of these systems, but there was one event in particular that made me really appreciate them in theory. I was running a demo game for a friend's system at a convention. Part of the one-shot was that the players had been trying to solve the mystery of who had been using forbidden magic. They solved the mystery, they knew they had the right guy, but they had no evidence. What they needed was a confession. However, when they went and confronted him, they rolled poorly. In a system like what I was used to, that would have been the end of it. I can't let them just keep trying, they rolled, they failed. However, instead this system allowed us to activate a "mental combat". It worked fairly simply. The players kept trying different tactics, intimidating, persuading, deceiving, and the person had a "defense" roll to rebuff their arguments. In a lot of ways, it was exactly like they just kept trying, but there was a key difference. As the "mental health" ran out, they would get forced by the system to drop the argument. Basically, by making this a "combat" like encounter with a boss, it gave them the chance to not simply lose, but since it was a "combat" if they did lose, they knew that they couldn't just keep retrying. They would be out of "health" and defeated. In the end, they succeeded. They flustered him into confessing before the authorities, and succeeded, and everyone felt AWESOME about it. I do think it is unneccesary for 90% of social encounters. But in those moments where you have the party against a stubborn social challenge, I think it is very useful to put a thin layer of mechanics on it, just to track progress. Just so that it isn't "Well jon rolled a 23, so we succeeded and no one else needs to roll" or "Jerry rolled a 5, guess we fail guys" instead it is "well, I got a 13, that chipped away at his defense, but he's still being slippery, maybe now is when we bring up that journal we found, shake him up." (I will now start reading the rest of the thread) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Your thoughts on "Social Combat" systems
Top