Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
You're doing what? Surprising the DM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 6105604" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>It was Shackled City Adventure Path. Can't remember which module. It has been some years.</p><p></p><p>And, I would say that you are spot on Jacob Marley. The context might matter if we were trying to fix this specific situation, and, of course, I know that no matter how much context I provide, some people will simply turn it around to say that I'm being a bad player.</p><p></p><p>Why is the context so important? The player doesn't want to play out <u>this scene</u>. Not every scene. Not even other similar scenes. Just this one. Why does it matter why he doesn't want to play this out? He's the one in the spotlight, so it's not a spotlight issue. There are clear goals that the players care about right there. It's not like exploring the desert was the goal.</p><p></p><p>If it was, then I would have been totally in the wrong. If, for example, we were trying to find a lost city in the desert, and I wanted to skip over the desert, then I would agree, totally a bad player. But, that's not the situation. We had a clear goal that we wanted to reach. Everything that we needed to move the plot forward was in that city. We knew that. Well, at the very least, the information we had said that everything we needed was in that city.</p><p></p><p>In other words, if the party wants to throw the One Ring into Mount Doom, and the party knows exactly where the Mount Doom is, and states that they aren't interested in anything but throwing the Ring into Mount Doom, why are we screwing around with Tom Bombadil?</p><p></p><p>The other scenes? Moria, Helm's Deep, etc? Ok, I can totally see how they are related to achieving Mount Doom. But Tom Bombadil? I don't care. I think that the movies got it right by cutting him out. I think that Tolkien was desperately in need of an editor who would have cut about a third out of the LoTR. Yes, I know that's heretical, but, I do know that I skip pretty large swaths of the books when I read them and I couldn't even force myself to finish the Silmarillion. </p><p></p><p>My entire point through this thread is to cut out the Tom Bombadil scenes from your campaigns. If the ride checks on the centipede are so easy that a Take 10 lets you bypass them, don't bother. Just move on. Note, that was the part I was talking about when I said I get a bit testy about DM's who do this. That morphed into a whole bunch of other stuff, and that's probably my fault for not being clearer. But, it's cutting out the superfluous stuff that really doesn't matter. Is learning that Warrior 1 Biff's goal in life is to marry his sweetheart going to help me kill the grell? No? Then why are you telling me? I don't care.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 6105604, member: 22779"] It was Shackled City Adventure Path. Can't remember which module. It has been some years. And, I would say that you are spot on Jacob Marley. The context might matter if we were trying to fix this specific situation, and, of course, I know that no matter how much context I provide, some people will simply turn it around to say that I'm being a bad player. Why is the context so important? The player doesn't want to play out [u]this scene[/u]. Not every scene. Not even other similar scenes. Just this one. Why does it matter why he doesn't want to play this out? He's the one in the spotlight, so it's not a spotlight issue. There are clear goals that the players care about right there. It's not like exploring the desert was the goal. If it was, then I would have been totally in the wrong. If, for example, we were trying to find a lost city in the desert, and I wanted to skip over the desert, then I would agree, totally a bad player. But, that's not the situation. We had a clear goal that we wanted to reach. Everything that we needed to move the plot forward was in that city. We knew that. Well, at the very least, the information we had said that everything we needed was in that city. In other words, if the party wants to throw the One Ring into Mount Doom, and the party knows exactly where the Mount Doom is, and states that they aren't interested in anything but throwing the Ring into Mount Doom, why are we screwing around with Tom Bombadil? The other scenes? Moria, Helm's Deep, etc? Ok, I can totally see how they are related to achieving Mount Doom. But Tom Bombadil? I don't care. I think that the movies got it right by cutting him out. I think that Tolkien was desperately in need of an editor who would have cut about a third out of the LoTR. Yes, I know that's heretical, but, I do know that I skip pretty large swaths of the books when I read them and I couldn't even force myself to finish the Silmarillion. My entire point through this thread is to cut out the Tom Bombadil scenes from your campaigns. If the ride checks on the centipede are so easy that a Take 10 lets you bypass them, don't bother. Just move on. Note, that was the part I was talking about when I said I get a bit testy about DM's who do this. That morphed into a whole bunch of other stuff, and that's probably my fault for not being clearer. But, it's cutting out the superfluous stuff that really doesn't matter. Is learning that Warrior 1 Biff's goal in life is to marry his sweetheart going to help me kill the grell? No? Then why are you telling me? I don't care. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
You're doing what? Surprising the DM
Top