Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 6107122" data-attributes="member: 4937">Yes, and I already agreed that they do, and that I preferred a somewhat slower pace.  My caution to you was that you said you prefered a faster pacing because you wished to reach a end/climax/ephinany sort of moment rather than have a campaign simply pitter out in the middle, and I said that that was perfectly understandable but there is a danger that if you rush the pacing the climax will be anti-climatic.Well, that's your reading.  I have described at least as many examples of things that would be in the players favor (buying a 'masterwork' horse or sword for a normal price, extra resources, exceptional aid, hirelings that work for free, hirelings that attach themselves as devoted henchmen, etc. etc. etc.).  However, whenever I suggest that there exists the possibility of failure, you've taken this to mean that the possibility is 100%.   Moreover, you've repeatedly argued that everything, including things that make things easier for the players, is 'not in their favor'.  And, I stand by my evidence in this thread that that is a bunch of hooey.   A neutral or referee stance is not antagonistic, and your insistance that it is does not do you any favors.</blockquote>