Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
You're doing what? Surprising the DM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JamesonCourage" data-source="post: 6118155" data-attributes="member: 6668292"><p>Why at the city? Why not at the temple gates? Why not outside the high priest's room? Why not in his presence? For that matter, why not in the desert?</p><p></p><p>This is something that's been evading me. And it's why I expanded on the "is it just wording" question. </p><p></p><p>It's not about exploring the desert.</p><p></p><p>Why do you think Hussar wants to deal with the city? From his statements, it looks like he wants to deal with his goal in the temple.</p><p></p><p>Which Hussar explicitly doesn't care about. See my last post for Hussar's thought on that.</p><p></p><p>No, at the temple. They're as much committed to doing something "in the city" as they are "in the desert." In Hussar's case, both seem to be "setting", and something he has no interest in.</p><p></p><p>Okay, so, when did Hussar express his want to interact with the city? When asked where you draw the line on where to put stuff, you said "The answer lies in the players' evinced preferences." But, you continued with "If the players have made it clear they want to get to the city", and I have to interrupt; when did Hussar make it evident he wants to interact with the city? Sure, he wants to go there, but he knows he has to cross the desert, too. He wants to get to the city to interact with whatever is inside the temple. What makes you think he sees the city as relevant when he voices that he wants to go there?</p><p></p><p>This makes me curious about what your thoughts are on my expansion of the "wording" question. Does how a player word things determine what you throw in their way?</p><p></p><p>This is true. But, to Hussar, it's "setting wank." It'll be relevant when he gets to it, or when it's "plot". Which, of course, the siege seems to be fine, but the refugees aren't. But I'm still not sure why.</p><p></p><p>It's not prep so much as play style. Hussar's views seem contradictory to me. And that'd make it harder to run a game (regardless of style of prep) for a player like him.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Same for the desert encounter, etc.</p><p></p><p>This is only true if you tie the siege directly to the PC's goals, which you could do for the desert encounter. As always, play what you like <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JamesonCourage, post: 6118155, member: 6668292"] Why at the city? Why not at the temple gates? Why not outside the high priest's room? Why not in his presence? For that matter, why not in the desert? This is something that's been evading me. And it's why I expanded on the "is it just wording" question. It's not about exploring the desert. Why do you think Hussar wants to deal with the city? From his statements, it looks like he wants to deal with his goal in the temple. Which Hussar explicitly doesn't care about. See my last post for Hussar's thought on that. No, at the temple. They're as much committed to doing something "in the city" as they are "in the desert." In Hussar's case, both seem to be "setting", and something he has no interest in. Okay, so, when did Hussar express his want to interact with the city? When asked where you draw the line on where to put stuff, you said "The answer lies in the players' evinced preferences." But, you continued with "If the players have made it clear they want to get to the city", and I have to interrupt; when did Hussar make it evident he wants to interact with the city? Sure, he wants to go there, but he knows he has to cross the desert, too. He wants to get to the city to interact with whatever is inside the temple. What makes you think he sees the city as relevant when he voices that he wants to go there? This makes me curious about what your thoughts are on my expansion of the "wording" question. Does how a player word things determine what you throw in their way? This is true. But, to Hussar, it's "setting wank." It'll be relevant when he gets to it, or when it's "plot". Which, of course, the siege seems to be fine, but the refugees aren't. But I'm still not sure why. It's not prep so much as play style. Hussar's views seem contradictory to me. And that'd make it harder to run a game (regardless of style of prep) for a player like him. Same for the desert encounter, etc. This is only true if you tie the siege directly to the PC's goals, which you could do for the desert encounter. As always, play what you like :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
You're doing what? Surprising the DM
Top