Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="JamesonCourage" data-source="post: 6123490" data-attributes="member: 6668292">I do not -even for a second- agree with this generalization. My current game has one PC who gets bonuses when risking his life, and the PC often goes out of his way to get into trouble, or slowly escalate situations. He's a gambler, he's in debt, and he likes taking acrobatic and combat risks. This is a character that, if he had his choice, would not want a quiet life. He wants those headaches; they're essential to his "go out and experience life" quest (which is essential to this character's take on religion).I largely agree with this.I'm interested in hearing your take. But, no offense, I'd rather not hear your take for Hussar. I think that might be contributing to my miscommunication with Hussar, and since I said I didn't want to talk about "relevance" anymore in the thread, I'm only breaking that rule because something Hussar said helped me, and it seemingly contradicted what you've told me. So, again, no offense, but I'm interested in Hussar's thoughts on this. Thanks for understanding. With that, thanks for the reply, and I hope someone else makes use of it. (Continue to feel free to reply to me, still, if you think it helps discussion in the thread, but I probably won't reply to anything that has to do with "interest" or "relevance" or "player buy-in" or the like, in general.) As always, play what you like <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification