Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Croesus" data-source="post: 5133827" data-attributes="member: 35019">Yep. Too often companies find a workable formula, then refuse to deviate from it. Kingmaker is a change of pace in your AP line, one that has brought in some customers like me, who have no desire for the more standard AP's. I love seeing a company take intelligent chances with their offerings.I have been working on and off (mostly off) for years on stripping 3.x down to its most basic elements, so that my group would have a simple ruleset for new players, yet we could add complexity to fit our tastes. I haven't picked up PF specifically because it's several hundred pages, full of little details that we'd have to learn and remember. I would love to see a basic ruleset for PF with tons of optional elements that could be added to taste. Of course, there are some potential problems with something like this. For starters, what optional rules would a module use? Or an entire AP? Would it spur additional sales, or cannibalize sales of the current PF rulesset? Would it appeal the core customer, the one who buys a significant amount of Paizo product on a regular basis, who (I suspect) prefer more complexity, not less? No idea, but I'd still love to see it.</blockquote>